Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

GGatekeeper

Gatekeeper Ltd

4.5/5
AAlloy

Alloy

4.3/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-Value2–6 weeks (~30d)About 1 month (~30d)
Typical annual TCO$35,000/yr$0/yr
Starting price$10,000/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersUnlimited users on all plans; tiers are set by third-party volume and workflow count, not seatsNot listed
Implementation friction3/54/5
Friction meter
Best forMid-market finance, procurement and legal teams managing 250–750+ third parties in one platform; Compliance and risk teams that need continuous third-party monitoring and an audit-ready trail; Organisations consolidating contract lifecycle management, vendor risk and spend into one record; Teams buried in manual vendor due diligence, certificate chasing and renewal adminBanks and credit unions that want one decisioning layer across onboarding, fraud, KYC and perpetual KYC; Fintechs and neobanks scaling account opening while holding fraud losses and manual review queues down; Compliance teams buried in watchlist alerts, sanctions screening and SAR/CTR filing work; Embedded finance sponsor banks enforcing risk policy across a portfolio of fintech partners; Risk teams that want vendor-neutral access to 270+ identity, device and watchlist data providers
Not forBuyers who want a free tier or self-serve trial: plans are quote-based with no published list price; Enterprises that only need a standalone e-signature or redlining tool; Very small businesses with a handful of contracts and no third-party risk programme; Teams that need public per-seat pricing before they will book a demoCompanies outside regulated financial services with no KYC, KYB or AML obligations; Small teams that want self-serve signup and published list pricing; Buyers who prefer a single bundled identity vendor over configuring their own data stack; Organizations without engineering or analyst capacity to integrate APIs and tune decision flows

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNot supportedNative
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceIntegrationIntegration
Microsoft 365IntegrationNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)NativeNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
HeadquartersNot recordedNew York, US
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailNot listedPlan not stated
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot listed
Community forumNot listedNot listed
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedNot listed
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsOfficial serverNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflows; Document processingCopilot / assistant; Agentic workflows; Predictive analytics; AI governance tooling
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditBasic visibilityFull audit trail

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Verified buyer score

2.9/53.2/53.5/53.8/54.1/54.7/54.5/54.4/54.3/54.1/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 430 solutions.