Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

AAssignar

Assignar

4.0/5
CCelonis

Celonis SE

4.0/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-ValueAbout 6–8 weeks (guided onboarding) (~45d)3–6 months (~90d)
Typical annual TCO$30,000/yr$0/yr
Starting price$12,000/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNo published seat tiers; custom quote per contractor. Unlimited users can be invited into the account.Not published; commercial terms are scoped with sales.
Implementation friction3/54/5
Friction meter
Best forCivil, infrastructure and specialty trade contractors that self-perform work and need live job margin, crew and plant visibility.; CFOs, controllers and commercial teams that want hours, plant and consumables costed to the job as work happens rather than at month-end.; Field supervisors and schedulers allocating crews and equipment against the same job record.; Contractors running multiple concurrent projects who want one portfolio view instead of spreadsheets.; Businesses cutting manual timesheet, docket and compliance paperwork and speeding up T&M invoicing.Large enterprises with complex, ERP-backed processes in supply chain, manufacturing, finance or IT that want measurable process improvement.; Organizations that want to deploy enterprise AI and agents against real process context rather than in isolated pilots.; Teams with an existing process-excellence or shared-services function plus executive sponsorship.
Not forNon-construction businesses; the product is built specifically for contractors and field operations.; Buyers who want a transparent self-serve list price or free tier, as pricing is quoted only after a demo.; Companies that do not run field crews, plant or job-based costing.; Very small owner-operator businesses looking for a lightweight scheduling-only tool.Small businesses looking for a quick, low-cost process mapping tool.; Buyers who require published self-serve pricing or a free plan.; Companies without accessible system event data to model their processes.

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNativeNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedIntegration
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2014 (12 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersSydney, AustraliaMunich, Germany
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailNot listedNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsPlan not statedNot listed
Community forumNot listedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsNot listedNot listed
Dedicated account managerEnterprise onlyNot listed
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursBusiness hoursNot recorded
Response timeSLA via support portal: 15 min (Fatal), 30 min (Severe), 60 min (Minor)Not stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresNot yet recordedAgentic workflows; Predictive analytics
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$8k/yr$16k/yr$24k/yr$32k/yr43d55d68d80d92dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value ↑ betterQuick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey
Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 40 solutions.