Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Certero logoCertero

Certero

4.3/5
775F

75F

3.8/5
ROI categorycost reductioncost reduction
Time-to-ValueAbout 3 months (~90d)~2-3 months (~60d)
Typical annual TCO$60,000/yr$0/yr
Starting price$10,000/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNot listedNot seat-based; priced per building / device footprint
Implementation friction3/53/5
Friction meter
Best forLarge, multi-site enterprises that must evidence licence compliance under vendor audit; IT, finance and procurement teams consolidating ITAM, SAM, SaaS, cloud and AI spend onto one asset model; Organisations that want the effective licence position maintained continuously, not rebuilt at renewal; Public-sector and healthcare estates spread across hundreds of sites and entities; Buyers replacing a portfolio of acquired point tools with one data modelMulti-site offices, retail, education and hospitality portfolios that want HVAC energy savings without a full controls rip-and-replace.; Facilities teams that prefer an IoT BMS with pre-packaged sequences, wireless sensors and cloud analytics over a traditional BMS project.; Contractors and energy service companies that install and commission building controls themselves rather than subcontracting.; Owners with carbon, sustainability or indoor-air-quality targets who need measurable, verifiable savings.
Not forSmall teams with no formal ITAM or software-licence function; Cloud-only startups wanting a lightweight, self-serve FinOps tool; Buyers who need published list pricing and same-day setup; Departments unwilling to deploy discovery agents or connectors across the estateIndustrial process control or life-safety systems that need PLC/DCS-grade determinism and certification.; Buyers who want a software-only analytics product with no hardware, wiring or commissioning.; Teams that need a public, self-serve price list and online sign-up; 75F pricing is quoted per project.; Companies wanting to assemble their own controls stack on an open, API-first platform.

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNativeNot supported
AWSNativeNot supported
SnowflakeNativeNot supported
HubSpotNativeNot supported
Google WorkspaceNativeNot supported
Microsoft 365NativeNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNativeNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2007 (19 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersWarrington, United KingdomNot recorded
PhoneNot listedPlan not stated
EmailNot listedPlan not stated
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsPaid plansNot listed
Community forumNot listedNot listed
Help centre / docsAll plansPlan not stated
Dedicated account managerNot listedNot listed
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAI governance toolingCopilot / assistant; Predictive analytics; Anomaly detection
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Verified buyer score

2.4/52.7/53.0/53.3/53.6/54.3/54.2/54.0/53.9/53.8/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 476 solutions.