Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

FFinout

Finout

New4.5/5
775F

75F

3.8/5
ROI categorycost reductioncost reduction
Time-to-ValueFirst anomaly in ~48 hours (~2d)~2-3 months (~60d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNo per-seat pricing; tiers differ by cost centers (2 / 3 / unlimited), data volume and which integrations you connect.Not seat-based; priced per building / device footprint
Implementation friction2/53/5
Friction meter
Best forFinOps and cloud cost teams managing multi-cloud estates across AWS, Azure, GCP and OCI; Companies that must allocate and show back shared cloud, Kubernetes and SaaS costs to business units; AI and ML platform teams that need to track token and model spend across OpenAI, Anthropic, Bedrock and Vertex AI; Engineering-led organisations wanting unit economics such as cost per customer or cost per deployment; Finance teams that want flat, predictable cost-management pricing rather than per-seat or percentage-of-spend feesMulti-site offices, retail, education and hospitality portfolios that want HVAC energy savings without a full controls rip-and-replace.; Facilities teams that prefer an IoT BMS with pre-packaged sequences, wireless sensors and cloud analytics over a traditional BMS project.; Contractors and energy service companies that install and commission building controls themselves rather than subcontracting.; Owners with carbon, sustainability or indoor-air-quality targets who need measurable, verifiable savings.
Not forSingle-cloud teams already satisfied with native AWS, GCP or Azure cost tools; Very small teams with low cloud spend that need a free self-serve tool; Buyers who require published list pricing or instant self-serve checkout before a sales conversation; Organisations looking for a general AI observability or LLM evaluation platform rather than AI cost management; Companies unwilling to grant read access to billing accounts and provider APIsIndustrial process control or life-safety systems that need PLC/DCS-grade determinism and certification.; Buyers who want a software-only analytics product with no hardware, wiring or commissioning.; Teams that need a public, self-serve price list and online sign-up; 75F pricing is quoted per project.; Companies wanting to assemble their own controls stack on an open, API-first platform.

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNativeNot supported
SnowflakeIntegrationNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365IntegrationNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackIntegrationNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
HeadquartersTel Aviv, IsraelNot recorded
PhoneNot listedPlan not stated
EmailNot listedPlan not stated
Live chatAll plansNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot listed
Community forumNot listedNot listed
Help centre / docsAll plansPlan not stated
Dedicated account managerEnterprise onlyNot listed
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresCopilot / assistant; Agentic workflows; Anomaly detectionCopilot / assistant; Predictive analytics; Anomaly detection
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditBasic visibilityNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$1/yr1d5d13d32d81dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 430 solutions.