Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

OnPay, LLC logoOnPay

OnPay, LLC

4.5/5
3360Learning

360Learning

4.7/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-Value1–2 weeks (white-glove setup) (~14d)2–4 weeks (~21d)
Typical annual TCO$2,388/yr$9,600/yr
Starting price$588/yr$96/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNo seat minimum and no per-seat charge; pricing scales per paid worker, with unlimited pay runs included.No minimum number of users; Team plan covers up to 100 users; Business and Enterprise scale by contract.
Implementation friction1/52/5
Friction meter
Best forSmall businesses that want payroll, tax filings and HR bundled at a flat, published price; Owners switching providers who want free data migration and white-glove setup; Teams that value US-based human support by phone, chat and email with no support paywall; Growing businesses needing multi-state payroll, 1099s and year-end filings included; Accounting firms and bookkeepers running client payroll through a partner programL&D teams that need to scale expert-authored content without a large instructional-design department; Enterprises consolidating several legacy LMS/LXP tools into one platform under a single contract; Global, multilingual workforces needing AI translation, mobile delivery and consistent compliance training; HR organisations that want Workday, SAP SuccessFactors or BambooHR data to auto-enrol learners
Not forLarge enterprises needing global payroll across many countries; Companies wanting a purely self-serve tool with no human onboarding touch; Buyers requiring ISO 27001, HIPAA or FedRAMP attestations today; Organizations needing a full HCM suite with applicant tracking and advanced analytics; Businesses that depend on a very large third-party app marketplaceBuyers who want transparent, published per-seat pricing above 100 users; Business and Enterprise are custom-quoted; Teams that mainly want a large third-party off-the-shelf course library rather than internally authored content; Organisations requiring certifications such as FedRAMP or HIPAA that the vendor does not publish

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedIntegration
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedIntegration
SAPNot supportedIntegration
SlackNot supportedIntegration
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
HeadquartersNot recordedNot recorded
PhoneAll plansNot listed
EmailAll plansNot listed
Live chatAll plansNot listed
Support portal / ticketsAll plansNot listed
Community forumNot listedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedEnterprise only
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursBusiness hoursNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresNot yet recordedCopilot / assistant; AI search; NLP automation
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Verified buyer score

1.0/51.2/51.5/51.8/52.1/54.8/54.7/54.6/54.5/54.3/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 573 solutions.