Side-by-side compare
Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.
ROI categorycost reductioncost reduction
Time-to-ValueUnder a day (CI/CD setup ~15 min) (~1d)~2-3 months (~60d)
Typical annual TCO$12,000/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersCloud plan includes 10 admin seats; developer seats are available for an additional feeNot seat-based; priced per building / device footprint
Implementation friction2/53/5
Friction meter
Best forPlatform engineering teams managing Terraform, CloudFormation or CDK infrastructure across AWS, Azure and GCP; FinOps practitioners who want cost policies and guardrails enforced inside CI/CD instead of dashboards alone; Engineering organisations with delegated cloud budgets that need cost diffs reviewed alongside code; Teams wanting a free starting point before committing to paid FinOps automationMulti-site offices, retail, education and hospitality portfolios that want HVAC energy savings without a full controls rip-and-replace.; Facilities teams that prefer an IoT BMS with pre-packaged sequences, wireless sensors and cloud analytics over a traditional BMS project.; Contractors and energy service companies that install and commission building controls themselves rather than subcontracting.; Owners with carbon, sustainability or indoor-air-quality targets who need measurable, verifiable savings.
Not forOrganisations without infrastructure as code, where cloud resources are created by hand in the console; Buyers looking for SaaS licence or non-cloud spend optimisation; Companies that cannot change CI/CD pipelines or grant pipeline access; Enterprises that need a self-hosted or air-gapped deployment, which is not offered on the published plansIndustrial process control or life-safety systems that need PLC/DCS-grade determinism and certification.; Buyers who want a software-only analytics product with no hardware, wiring or commissioning.; Teams that need a public, self-serve price list and online sign-up; 75F pricing is quoted per project.; Companies wanting to assemble their own controls stack on an open, API-first platform.
Stack fit matrix
SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNativeNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported
Compliance
SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff
Company & support
Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.
Founded2021 (5 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersNot recordedNot recorded
PhoneNot listedPlan not stated
EmailPaid plansPlan not stated
Live chatEnterprise onlyNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot listed
Community forumAll plansNot listed
Help centre / docsAll plansPlan not stated
Dedicated account managerNot listedNot listed
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated
AI & MCP readiness
Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.
MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflowsCopilot / assistant; Predictive analytics; Anomaly detection
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded
Quadrant view
Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.
Quadrant view
Implementation friction × Verified buyer score
The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.
Looking for more options? Browse all 667 solutions.