Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Redaptive logoRedaptive

Redaptive

4.0/5
775F

75F

3.8/5
ROI categorycost reductioncost reduction
Time-to-Value6–12 months to first sites live (~180d)~2-3 months (~60d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNot seat-based; engagement is scoped per portfolio and programNot seat-based; priced per building / device footprint
Implementation friction3/53/5
Friction meter
Best forLarge enterprises with distributed, multi-site portfolios in industrial, real estate and healthcare; Facilities and energy teams that need infrastructure upgrades delivered without upfront capital; Organizations with cost-reduction, resilience or decarbonization targets; Owners that want verified measurement of energy and maintenance savings across sitesMulti-site offices, retail, education and hospitality portfolios that want HVAC energy savings without a full controls rip-and-replace.; Facilities teams that prefer an IoT BMS with pre-packaged sequences, wireless sensors and cloud analytics over a traditional BMS project.; Contractors and energy service companies that install and commission building controls themselves rather than subcontracting.; Owners with carbon, sustainability or indoor-air-quality targets who need measurable, verifiable savings.
Not forSmall businesses or single-site operators without portfolio scale; Teams that want to buy and own equipment outright with their own capital budget; Companies looking only for standalone energy analytics or dashboard software; Buyers who need an instant-on, self-serve SaaS productIndustrial process control or life-safety systems that need PLC/DCS-grade determinism and certification.; Buyers who want a software-only analytics product with no hardware, wiring or commissioning.; Teams that need a public, self-serve price list and online sign-up; 75F pricing is quoted per project.; Companies wanting to assemble their own controls stack on an open, API-first platform.

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
HeadquartersDenver, USNot recorded
PhoneNot listedPlan not stated
EmailNot listedPlan not stated
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsAll plansNot listed
Community forumNot listedNot listed
Help centre / docsNot listedPlan not stated
Dedicated account managerNot listedNot listed
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeOne business day (Redaptive Customer Care via the Redaptive ONE Support Portal)Not stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresNot yet recordedCopilot / assistant; Predictive analytics; Anomaly detection
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$1/yr48d84d120d150d190dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 573 solutions.