Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Dun & Bradstreet logoDun & Bradstreet

Dun & Bradstreet

4.0/5
activpayroll logoactivpayroll

activpayroll

4.0/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-ValueRoughly 3 months to first production value (~90d)About 6 months for a multi-country rollout (~180d)
Typical annual TCO$25,000/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNot publicly published; scoped per enterprise agreementNot published; engagement scoped per country and employee count
Implementation friction4/54/5
Friction meter
Best forCompliance, KYB, and third-party risk teams that need continuous monitoring and auditable decisions; Procurement and supply-chain leaders seeking end-to-end visibility into supplier risk; Finance and credit teams that need verified financial signals and faster onboarding; Data and AI teams that need a governed, verified business-context layer for their own agents; Master-data and analytics teams unifying fragmented business records at enterprise scaleMultinational employers running payroll in many countries who want one provider and one governance model; Companies consolidating multiple in-country payroll providers into a single global model; HR and finance teams that need payroll wired into HRIS/HCM systems such as Workday, UKG, HiBob, Sage People or Cornerstone; Organisations with internationally mobile staff needing assignment payroll, expat tax and mobility coordination
Not forSmall businesses that only need a free D-U-N-S Number; Teams wanting a self-serve tool with published list pricing; Buyers without the data-engineering resources to consume APIs and warehouse feeds; Companies looking for a turnkey CRM or ERP rather than a data and analytics layerSingle-country employers with simple domestic payroll needs; Buyers who want self-serve payroll software with no managed-service layer; Teams that require published, self-checkout pricing before evaluation; Very small headcounts where a global managed payroll model is disproportionate

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeIntegrationNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365IntegrationNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recorded2001 (25 yrs)
HeadquartersJacksonville, USNot recorded
PhoneNot yet recordedNot listed
EmailNot yet recordedNot listed
Live chatNot yet recordedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot yet recordedNot listed
Community forumNot yet recordedNot listed
Help centre / docsNot yet recordedNot listed
Dedicated account managerNot yet recordedPlan not stated
In person / on-siteNot yet recordedNot listed
Support hoursNot yet recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot yet recordedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresCopilot / assistant; Agentic workflowsNot yet recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$7/yr$157/yr$3k/yr$68k/yr81d110d135d160d180dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 792 solutions.