Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Aikido Security BV logoAikido Security

Aikido Security BV

4.7/5
1Password logo1Password

1Password

4.5/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-ValueSame day; first scan in minutes (~1d)2-6 weeks (~30d)
Typical annual TCO$7,200/yr$0/yr
Starting price$3,600/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiers10 users included on Basic, Pro and Advanced; seats increase in 5-10 user steps up to 50+Not published; pricing is tailored to organization size and the products selected.
Implementation friction1/52/5
Friction meter
Best forDev and security teams that want one platform for code, dependency, cloud, runtime and pentest security; Organisations replacing noisy SAST/SCA suites and needing far fewer false positives; Teams that need auditor-accepted reports for SOC 2, ISO 27001 or HIPAA evidence; Startups and scale-ups wanting a free tier and self-serve, minutes-long onboardingSecurity teams standardizing credential protection for employees, developers, and service accounts in one vault; Enterprises that need coverage for apps and credentials outside their identity provider; Organizations that must discover shadow AI/SaaS usage and govern AI agent access at runtime; Developer-heavy engineering orgs needing secrets management and CLI/CI pipeline automation; Compliance-driven buyers that want audit-ready activity and session logs
Not forTeams without in-house engineers or a CI/CD pipeline to connect repositories; Buyers who want a single narrow best-of-breed scanner rather than a consolidated platform; Organisations that require a FedRAMP authorisation today; Non-software businesses with no code, container or cloud estate to secureCost-sensitive teams that want a simple shared vault with published per-seat list pricing; Organizations whose identity provider already covers every application they run; Buyers who require instant self-serve signup and checkout without a sales conversation; Teams needing a vertically specialized platform (for example a vendor-stated HIPAA BAA or FedRAMP authorization) evidenced up front

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSIntegrationIntegration
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedIntegration
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackIntegrationNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)NativeNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Listed Listed
ISO 27001 Listed Not listed
GDPR Listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNo caution

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2022 (4 yrs)2005 (21 yrs)
HeadquartersGhent, BelgiumToronto, Canada
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailNot listedNot listed
Live chatPlan not statedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot listed
Community forumNot listedAll plans
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerEnterprise onlyNot listed
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeSame-day support on Pro; next business day on entry plans; SLA-based on Advanced and EnterpriseNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsOfficial serverNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflows; Copilot / assistantAI governance tooling
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingBilled by usage or creditsNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

1.0/51.2/51.5/51.8/52.1/54.9/54.7/54.6/54.5/54.3/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1304 solutions.