Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Appsmith, Inc. logoAppsmith

Appsmith, Inc.

4.7/5
42Gears logo42Gears SureMDM

42Gears

4.2/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-Value~2 weeks to first app (~14d)2-4 weeks (~14d)
Typical annual TCO$9,000/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersFree: up to 5 cloud users; Business: up to 99 users; Enterprise: unlimited from 100 usersPriced per device with no minimum quantity; tiers scale by volume.
Implementation friction2/52/5
Friction meter
Best forEngineering teams that want to build internal tools, admin panels and customer dashboards roughly 80% faster than writing them from scratch; Enterprises that need to self-host or run air-gapped, with SAML/OIDC SSO, SCIM user provisioning, granular roles and audit logs; Teams extending legacy or SaaS platforms through embedded apps and custom extensions to cut seat-licence costs; Companies connecting LLMs, databases and REST/GraphQL APIs into secure internal AI apps and agentsFleets of shared, frontline, rugged or BYOD devices across Android, iOS, Windows, macOS, Linux, ChromeOS, Wear OS and VR; Operations that need identity-aware Zero Trust access (SureIdP, SureAccess) rather than blanket VPN access; IT teams consolidating MDM, kiosk mode, IoT and peripheral management into one console; MSPs and resellers delivering managed device services via SureMDM Hub; Mid-market and enterprise buyers who want volume, no-minimum licensing rather than rigid seat tiers
Not forBusiness users who want a fully no-code builder — Appsmith is developer-first and assumes JavaScript/HTML/CSS for full customization; Buyers looking for packaged vertical applications rather than a platform they have to build on; SaaS-only organizations unwilling to run or approve an open-source, self-hostable platform; Consumer or customer-facing mobile products that need native app experiencesKnowledge-worker Mac/Windows fleets already standardised on Microsoft Intune or Jamf; Buyers who require published self-serve list pricing and instant self-signup; Companies that need native Salesforce, Snowflake or data-cloud integrations; Organisations that require a public FedRAMP authorisation

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceIntegrationNot supported
AWSIntegrationNot supported
SnowflakeIntegrationNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceIntegrationNot supported
Microsoft 365IntegrationIntegration
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackIntegrationNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
CMMC Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNo caution

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
HeadquartersNot recordedBengaluru, India
PhoneNot listedAll plans
EmailPaid plansAll plans
Live chatPaid plansAll plans
Support portal / ticketsNot listedAll plans
Community forumAll plansNot listed
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerEnterprise onlyNot listed
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hours24/724/7
Response timeEnterprise plan includes 24x7 support coverage with response-time SLAsNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresCopilot / assistant; Agentic workflowsNot yet recorded
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onOpenAINot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyVendor's keyNot recorded
AI usage auditBasic visibilityNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

1.4/51.7/52.0/52.3/52.6/54.7/54.6/54.5/54.3/54.2/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1839 solutions.