Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Centurion Management Systems Ltd (trading as Breathe HR) logoBreathe

Centurion Management Systems Ltd (trading as Breathe HR)

4.0/5
360Learning logo360Learning

360Learning

4.7/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-Value1–2 weeks (self-service trial) (~14d)2–4 weeks (~21d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$9,600/yr
Starting price$0/yr$96/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersPricing follows plan tiers (some features noted as 'regular and above') rather than seat minimums; employee data is imported self-serviceNo minimum number of users; Team plan covers up to 100 users; Business and Enterprise scale by contract.
Implementation friction2/52/5
Friction meter
Best forUK SMEs with up to 250 employees wanting one system for HR admin, leave, absence and rotas; Small businesses replacing HR spreadsheets with self-service leave requests and absence tracking; Teams that need to centralise health & safety records, risk assessments and incident logs to stay audit-ready; Employers wanting UK-specific online training (100+ courses) with tracked progress and certificates; Companies that prefer flexible, commitment-free subscriptions over long-term contractsL&D teams that need to scale expert-authored content without a large instructional-design department; Enterprises consolidating several legacy LMS/LXP tools into one platform under a single contract; Global, multilingual workforces needing AI translation, mobile delivery and consistent compliance training; HR organisations that want Workday, SAP SuccessFactors or BambooHR data to auto-enrol learners
Not forOrganisations with well over 250 employees or complex multi-country HR structures; Businesses that require employee data to be hosted outside the UK; Companies wanting a heavily customised enterprise HCM delivered through a large implementation projectBuyers who want transparent, published per-seat pricing above 100 users; Business and Enterprise are custom-quoted; Teams that mainly want a large third-party off-the-shelf course library rather than internally authored content; Organisations requiring certifications such as FedRAMP or HIPAA that the vendor does not publish

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedIntegration
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedIntegration
SAPNot supportedIntegration
SlackNot supportedIntegration
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Not listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Listed Not listed
GDPR Listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNot checked yet

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
HeadquartersNot recordedNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailAll plansNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot listed
Community forumNot listedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedEnterprise only
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresCopilot / assistantCopilot / assistant; AI search; NLP automation
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

1.4/51.7/52.0/52.3/52.6/54.7/54.5/54.3/54.2/54.0/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1498 solutions.