Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

CenterEdge logoCenterEdge

CenterEdge

4.0/5
360Learning logo360Learning

360Learning

4.6/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-ValueAbout 30 days with guided onboarding (~30d)2–4 weeks (~30d)
Typical annual TCO$6,600/yr$9,600/yr
Starting price$3,600/yr$96/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiers1-3 workstations $300/mo; 4-9 $550/mo; 10-15 $800/mo; 16+ custom quoteTeam plan caps at 100 users; no minimum number of users, and larger volumes unlock premium onboarding and dedicated support
Implementation friction2/52/5
Friction meter
Best forFamily entertainment centers that run attractions, food and beverage, retail and events from one POS; Amusement, water and adventure parks needing admissions, cashless cards and wristband management; Operators that want POS, payment processing and support bundled from a single vendor; Venues that prefer transparent, all-inclusive monthly pricing over feature-gated tiersMid-size to large L&D teams that want subject-matter experts, not only instructional designers, authoring courses; Organizations consolidating several legacy LMS, LXP and authoring tools onto one platform and one contract; Compliance-heavy, multilingual workforces needing automated mandatory training and re-certification; Sales enablement and frontline teams that need mobile-first, video-based coaching at scale
Not forSingle-concept restaurants, retailers or hotels with no attractions business; Companies needing deep ERP, manufacturing or project-accounting functionality; Operators who want a self-serve trial product rather than a demo-led, installed rollout; Venues whose core need is online distribution or channel managementBuyers who need a published self-serve price list for every tier (Business and Enterprise are custom-quoted); Organizations that require on-premise or air-gapped deployment of their learning platform; Teams that only want to buy an off-the-shelf course library rather than build and maintain content; Very small teams needing nothing more than a place to host a handful of SCORM modules

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedIntegration
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedIntegration
SAPNot supportedIntegration
SlackNot supportedIntegration
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Not listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
CMMC Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNo caution

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2004 (22 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersNot recordedNot recorded
PhoneAll plansNot listed
EmailAll plansNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsAll plansNot listed
Community forumNot listedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedEnterprise only
In person / on-siteAll plansNot listed
Support hours24/7Not recorded
Response timeNot statedPriority SLA on the Enterprise plan; no numeric target published

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresNot yet recordedCopilot / assistant; Agentic workflows; Predictive analytics; NLP automation
Built around AI?Not recordedAI added to an existing product
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedIncluded in the plan
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

1.4/51.7/52.0/52.3/52.6/54.6/54.4/54.3/54.2/54.0/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 2456 solutions.