Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Claroty logoClaroty

Claroty

4.7/5
1Password logo1Password

1Password

4.5/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-Value2–3 months (passive deployment) (~60d)2-6 weeks (~30d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersEnterprise agreements only; no public seat tiers or minimums disclosed.Not published; pricing is tailored to organization size and the products selected.
Implementation friction4/52/5
Friction meter
Best forIndustrial, healthcare and commercial operators that need continuous visibility into OT, IoT and medical devices without disrupting operations; Security teams that must prove regulatory and insurance compliance with automated reporting; Organizations that want to consolidate asset inventory, exposure management, network protection and threat detection in one CPS platform; Enterprises already running Microsoft, Splunk, Palo Alto or ServiceNow stacks that need CPS context fed into themSecurity teams standardizing credential protection for employees, developers, and service accounts in one vault; Enterprises that need coverage for apps and credentials outside their identity provider; Organizations that must discover shadow AI/SaaS usage and govern AI agent access at runtime; Developer-heavy engineering orgs needing secrets management and CLI/CI pipeline automation; Compliance-driven buyers that want audit-ready activity and session logs
Not forSmall or mid-size businesses looking for a low-cost, self-serve security tool; IT-only security teams with no OT, IoT or cyber-physical estate; Buyers who require published list pricing, a free tier or instant online sign-up; Organizations unwilling to run or host passive monitoring in production networksCost-sensitive teams that want a simple shared vault with published per-seat list pricing; Organizations whose identity provider already covers every application they run; Buyers who require instant self-serve signup and checkout without a sales conversation; Teams needing a vertically specialized platform (for example a vendor-stated HIPAA BAA or FedRAMP authorization) evidenced up front

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNot supportedIntegration
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365IntegrationIntegration
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Listed Listed
ISO 27001 Listed Not listed
GDPR Listed Not listed
HIPAA Listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNo caution

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recorded2005 (21 yrs)
HeadquartersNot recordedToronto, Canada
PhoneNot yet recordedNot listed
EmailNot yet recordedNot listed
Live chatNot yet recordedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot yet recordedNot listed
Community forumNot yet recordedAll plans
Help centre / docsNot yet recordedAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot yet recordedNot listed
In person / on-siteNot yet recordedNot listed
Support hoursNot yet recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot yet recordedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflowsAI governance tooling
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

1.8/52.4/53.0/53.6/54.2/54.9/54.7/54.6/54.5/54.3/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1304 solutions.