Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Keepnet Labs logoKeepnet

Keepnet Labs

4.7/5
Abnormal AI, Inc. logoAbnormal

Abnormal AI, Inc.

4.0/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-Value2–4 weeks (~21d)Under 2 weeks (~14d)
Typical annual TCO$5,600/yr$0/yr
Starting price$540/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersHeadcount bands 25–50, 51–100, 101–500, 501–1000 and 1000+; under 50 employees quoted individually.Not listed
Implementation friction2/52/5
Friction meter
Best forSecurity teams running phishing simulation and security awareness training for 250+ employees; MSSPs and MSPs delivering managed security awareness and phishing simulation to their clients; Organizations that need multi-channel simulation: email, SMS, voice, QR code, callback and MFA phishing; Buyers consolidating awareness training, employee phishing reporting and phishing incident response on one platform; Multi-site or multi-language workforces needing automated user provisioning and repeatable campaignsSecurity teams replacing legacy secure email gateways (SEG) with API-based, autonomous detection; Organizations on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace that want deployment with no agents or MX changes; Enterprises needing behavioral detection of BEC, account takeover, credential phishing and GenAI social engineering; Security leaders who want AI to investigate and respond autonomously while showing evidence; Companies that also need identity hardening and governance of internal AI agent/tool use
Not forCompanies wanting a fully self-serve, credit-card checkout with a published list price; Very small organizations (under 25 seats) with no security awareness budget; Teams that only need a basic annual compliance training module and no simulations; Buyers looking for technical email gateway or endpoint protection rather than human risk trainingVery small businesses looking for a low-cost, self-serve email filter with published list pricing; Teams without security operations capacity to configure and tune enterprise security controls; Buyers who require public per-seat pricing and self-service signup before a sales process; Organizations that need an SMB-grade spam filter rather than behavioral threat detection

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceIntegrationNot supported
AWSIntegrationNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotIntegrationNot supported
Google WorkspaceIntegrationNative
Microsoft 365IntegrationNative
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Listed Listed
ISO 27001 Listed Listed
GDPR Listed Listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Listed Listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNo caution

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2017 (9 yrs)2018 (8 yrs)
HeadquartersLondon, UKNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailNot listedNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedPlan not stated
Community forumNot listedNot listed
Help centre / docsNot listedNot listed
Dedicated account managerEnterprise onlyNot listed
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflowsAnomaly detection; Predictive analytics; Agentic workflows
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productAI-native
Trains on your dataNever trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingPaid add-onNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

1.4/51.7/52.0/52.3/52.6/54.7/54.5/54.3/54.2/54.0/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1304 solutions.