Side-by-side compare
Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-ValueDays to 1–2 weeks (~7d)2–4 weeks (~30d)
Typical annual TCO$4,800/yr$0/yr
Starting price$240/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersTeam: minimum 5, up to 15 contributors. Enterprise: unlimited contributors. IDE Auto-fix sold per dev.Enterprise-wide agreements; no published seat tiers
Implementation friction2/52/5
Friction meter
Best forAppSec and DevSecOps teams that want scanner findings auto-fixed as ready-to-merge pull requests instead of tickets.; Engineering organizations adopting AI coding tools that need guardrails against AI-introduced vulnerabilities.; Financial services, insurance and health tech teams under SOC 2 or PCI 4.1 audit pressure.; Teams already running Checkmarx, Fortify, SonarQube, Snyk or CodeQL on GitHub, GitLab, Azure Repos or Bitbucket.Enterprise SOCs with high alert volume across identity, cloud and EDR telemetry; Security leaders who want tier-1 triage, enrichment and investigation run by AI agents; Buyers who prefer an outcome-based service over another console to operate; Organisations that need faster investigation throughput without hiring more analysts
Not forTeams with no existing SAST or scanner pipeline; Mobb fixes findings, it does not scan for them.; Organizations that want a full ASPM or vulnerability management suite rather than remediation.; Small teams that cannot meet the Team plan's five-contributor minimum.; Buyers who require self-hosted deployment at the free or Team tier; on-prem is Enterprise only.Small teams with no dedicated security operations function; Buyers requiring publicly listed pricing before evaluation; Organisations that must keep all security data on-premises (no such deployment is documented)
Stack fit matrix
SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported
Compliance
SOC 2 Not listed Listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
CMMC Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
Company & support
Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.
Founded2021 (5 yrs)2024 (2 yrs)
HeadquartersNot recordedNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot yet recorded
EmailPaid plansNot yet recorded
Live chatPaid plansNot yet recorded
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot yet recorded
Community forumAll plansNot yet recorded
Help centre / docsAll plansNot yet recorded
Dedicated account managerEnterprise onlyNot yet recorded
In person / on-siteNot listedNot yet recorded
Support hoursNot recordedNot yet recorded
Response timeNot statedNot yet recorded
AI & MCP readiness
Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.
MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflowsAgentic workflows
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productAI-native
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingIncluded in the planNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded
Quadrant view
Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.
Quadrant view
Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)
The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.
Looking for more options? Browse all 2416 solutions.