Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

n8n GmbH logon8n

n8n GmbH

4.7/5
360Learning logo360Learning

360Learning

4.7/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-ValueFirst workflow in hours; production value in days (~7d)2–4 weeks (~21d)
Typical annual TCO$8,000/yr$9,600/yr
Starting price$240/yr$96/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersUnlimited users on every plan including Starter; limits are on executions, concurrency, projects and history retention, not seatsNo minimum number of users; Team plan covers up to 100 users; Business and Enterprise scale by contract.
Implementation friction2/52/5
Friction meter
Best forTechnical teams in IT ops, DevOps and SecOps automating cross-system workflows; Companies that want self-hosted or on-prem automation with full source access; Teams building AI agents that need human-in-the-loop checks, guardrails and evaluations; Builder teams that want a visual canvas plus JavaScript or Python code steps in one workflow; Enterprises needing SSO/SAML/LDAP, RBAC, audit logs and SIEM log streamingL&D teams that need to scale expert-authored content without a large instructional-design department; Enterprises consolidating several legacy LMS/LXP tools into one platform under a single contract; Global, multilingual workforces needing AI translation, mobile delivery and consistent compliance training; HR organisations that want Workday, SAP SuccessFactors or BambooHR data to auto-enrol learners
Not forBusiness users who need a fully no-code, click-only automation tool; Teams that only need a handful of simple point-to-point app connections; Buyers who want a fully managed service with the vendor owning every workflow; Organisations unwilling to accept usage-based execution pricing or overagesBuyers who want transparent, published per-seat pricing above 100 users; Business and Enterprise are custom-quoted; Teams that mainly want a large third-party off-the-shelf course library rather than internally authored content; Organisations requiring certifications such as FedRAMP or HIPAA that the vendor does not publish

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceIntegrationIntegration
AWSIntegrationNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotIntegrationNot supported
Google WorkspaceIntegrationNot supported
Microsoft 365IntegrationIntegration
SAPNot supportedIntegration
SlackIntegrationIntegration
MCP (Model Context Protocol)NativeNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNot checked yet

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2019 (7 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersBerlin, GermanyNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailPaid plansNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsEnterprise onlyNot listed
Community forumAll plansPlan not stated
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedEnterprise only
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeEnterprise plan adds dedicated support with SLA-backed response times (specific targets not published)Not stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsOfficial serverNot supported
AI featuresCopilot / assistant; Agentic workflows; Document processing; AI governance toolingCopilot / assistant; AI search; NLP automation
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productNot recorded
Trains on your dataNever trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onOpenAI, Anthropic, GoogleNot recorded
AI pricingIncluded in the planNot recorded
Model keyEitherNot recorded
AI usage auditFull audit trailNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

1.4/51.7/52.0/52.3/52.6/54.9/54.8/54.7/54.6/54.4/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1401 solutions.