Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Staffbase logoStaffbase

Staffbase

4.7/5
360Learning logo360Learning

360Learning

4.7/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-ValueAbout 90 days to launch (~90d)2–4 weeks (~21d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$9,600/yr
Starting price$0/yr$96/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersFrontline-specific, mixed-workforce and enterprise configurations; no public seat tiersNo minimum number of users; Team plan covers up to 100 users; Business and Enterprise scale by contract.
Implementation friction4/52/5
Friction meter
Best forEnterprises with large frontline, shift-based or deskless workforces that desktop intranets fail to reach; Internal communications, HR and IT teams that need one governed source of truth across intranet, app, email and signage; Multi-brand or multi-region organisations needing federated governance and role-aware content; Microsoft 365 shops that want native Teams, SharePoint, Viva and Copilot integration; HR teams trying to cut repetitive policy, benefits and IT questions through AI self-serviceL&D teams that need to scale expert-authored content without a large instructional-design department; Enterprises consolidating several legacy LMS/LXP tools into one platform under a single contract; Global, multilingual workforces needing AI translation, mobile delivery and consistent compliance training; HR organisations that want Workday, SAP SuccessFactors or BambooHR data to auto-enrol learners
Not forSmall businesses or teams of a few hundred employees wanting self-serve signup; Buyers who need published, transparent list pricing before evaluation; Organisations wanting a fast, lightweight intranet launch without a services engagement; Companies unwilling to invest in content ownership and governance disciplineBuyers who want transparent, published per-seat pricing above 100 users; Business and Enterprise are custom-quoted; Teams that mainly want a large third-party off-the-shelf course library rather than internally authored content; Organisations requiring certifications such as FedRAMP or HIPAA that the vendor does not publish

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedIntegration
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceIntegrationNot supported
Microsoft 365NativeIntegration
SAPIntegrationIntegration
SlackNot supportedIntegration
MCP (Model Context Protocol)NativeNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Listed Not listed
GDPR Listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
CMMC Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNot checked yet

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2014 (12 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersNot recordedNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailNot listedNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsPlan not statedNot listed
Community forumPlan not statedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsPlan not statedAll plans
Dedicated account managerPlan not statedEnterprise only
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsOfficial serverNot supported
AI featuresCopilot / assistant; Agentic workflows; AI search; AI governance toolingCopilot / assistant; AI search; NLP automation
Built around AI?AI-nativeNot recorded
Trains on your dataNever trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onOpenAINot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyVendor's keyNot recorded
AI usage auditFull audit trailNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

1.8/52.4/53.0/53.6/54.2/54.9/54.8/54.7/54.6/54.4/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1839 solutions.