Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

TTennr

Tennr

4.0/5
360Learning logo360Learning

360Learning

4.6/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-Value2–6 weeks (~30d)2–4 weeks (~30d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$9,600/yr
Starting price$0/yr$96/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNot publishedTeam plan caps at 100 users; no minimum number of users, and larger volumes unlock premium onboarding and dedicated support
Implementation friction3/52/5
Friction meter
Best forSpecialty providers with heavy fax, referral and order volume, including sleep, DME and complex rehab; Provider networks and health systems automating pre-visit intake and prior authorization; Revenue cycle teams targeting first-pass denial reduction and faster cash collection; Groups that want payer and prescriber phone follow-up handled without adding staffMid-size to large L&D teams that want subject-matter experts, not only instructional designers, authoring courses; Organizations consolidating several legacy LMS, LXP and authoring tools onto one platform and one contract; Compliance-heavy, multilingual workforces needing automated mandatory training and re-certification; Sales enablement and frontline teams that need mobile-first, video-based coaching at scale
Not forBuyers looking for a full EHR, scheduling or clinical documentation system; Very low-volume single-provider practices that cannot justify a platform; Organizations outside US healthcare payer and referral workflows; Teams unwilling to let software communicate with payers and prescribers on their behalfBuyers who need a published self-serve price list for every tier (Business and Enterprise are custom-quoted); Organizations that require on-premise or air-gapped deployment of their learning platform; Teams that only want to buy an off-the-shelf course library rather than build and maintain content; Very small teams needing nothing more than a place to host a handful of SCORM modules

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedIntegration
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedIntegration
SAPNot supportedIntegration
SlackNot supportedIntegration
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Not listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
CMMC Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNo caution

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
HeadquartersNew York, USNot recorded
PhoneNot yet recordedNot listed
EmailNot yet recordedNot listed
Live chatNot yet recordedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot yet recordedNot listed
Community forumNot yet recordedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsNot yet recordedAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot yet recordedEnterprise only
In person / on-siteNot yet recordedNot listed
Support hoursNot yet recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot yet recordedPriority SLA on the Enterprise plan; no numeric target published

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflows; Document processingCopilot / assistant; Agentic workflows; Predictive analytics; NLP automation
Built around AI?AI-nativeAI added to an existing product
Trains on your dataTrains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedIncluded in the plan
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

1.9/52.2/52.5/52.8/53.1/54.6/54.4/54.3/54.2/54.0/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 2264 solutions.