Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Aikido Security BV logoAikido Security

Aikido Security BV

4.7/5
Abnormal AI, Inc. logoAbnormal

Abnormal AI, Inc.

4.0/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-ValueSame day; first scan in minutes (~1d)Under 2 weeks (~14d)
Typical annual TCO$7,200/yr$0/yr
Starting price$3,600/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiers10 users included on Basic, Pro and Advanced; seats increase in 5-10 user steps up to 50+Not listed
Implementation friction1/52/5
Friction meter
Best forDev and security teams that want one platform for code, dependency, cloud, runtime and pentest security; Organisations replacing noisy SAST/SCA suites and needing far fewer false positives; Teams that need auditor-accepted reports for SOC 2, ISO 27001 or HIPAA evidence; Startups and scale-ups wanting a free tier and self-serve, minutes-long onboardingSecurity teams replacing legacy secure email gateways (SEG) with API-based, autonomous detection; Organizations on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace that want deployment with no agents or MX changes; Enterprises needing behavioral detection of BEC, account takeover, credential phishing and GenAI social engineering; Security leaders who want AI to investigate and respond autonomously while showing evidence; Companies that also need identity hardening and governance of internal AI agent/tool use
Not forTeams without in-house engineers or a CI/CD pipeline to connect repositories; Buyers who want a single narrow best-of-breed scanner rather than a consolidated platform; Organisations that require a FedRAMP authorisation today; Non-software businesses with no code, container or cloud estate to secureVery small businesses looking for a low-cost, self-serve email filter with published list pricing; Teams without security operations capacity to configure and tune enterprise security controls; Buyers who require public per-seat pricing and self-service signup before a sales process; Organizations that need an SMB-grade spam filter rather than behavioral threat detection

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSIntegrationNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNative
Microsoft 365Not supportedNative
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackIntegrationNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)NativeNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Listed Listed
ISO 27001 Listed Listed
GDPR Listed Listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Listed Listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNo caution

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2022 (4 yrs)2018 (8 yrs)
HeadquartersGhent, BelgiumNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailNot listedNot listed
Live chatPlan not statedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedPlan not stated
Community forumNot listedNot listed
Help centre / docsAll plansNot listed
Dedicated account managerEnterprise onlyNot listed
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeSame-day support on Pro; next business day on entry plans; SLA-based on Advanced and EnterpriseNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsOfficial serverNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflows; Copilot / assistantAnomaly detection; Predictive analytics; Agentic workflows
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productAI-native
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingBilled by usage or creditsNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$5/yr$84/yr$1k/yr$17k/yr0d4d8d11d15dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1304 solutions.