Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Checkmarx Ltd. logoCheckmarx

Checkmarx Ltd.

4.7/5
Abrigo logoAbrigo

Abrigo

4.0/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-Value~4 weeks to first scans (~30d)~3 months (estimated) (~90d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNo self-serve tiers. Packages: Essentials, Professional, Enterprise, plus 'Start with SAST' / 'Start with Supply Chain' and custom builds.Not published; licensed at the institution level
Implementation friction4/54/5
Friction meter
Best forEnterprises with large developer fleets that need SAST, SCA, DAST and container security from one AppSec platform; Security teams consolidating siloed AppSec point tools into unified posture management and policy orchestration; Organizations that must inventory and govern AI-generated code, models and MCP servers in their pipeline; Regulated buyers needing documented records of findings, decisions, exceptions and approvals for audits; Companies wanting SaaS or self-hosted/air-gapped deployment with 50+ native tool integrationsCommunity banks and credit unions managing AML/CFT and fraud risk; Institutions that need lending, credit risk, and CECL portfolio reporting in one suite; BSA/AML and compliance teams facing FFIEC and regulatory examination pressure; Banks wanting CRM, marketing, and analytics alongside risk tooling
Not forTeams that want transparent list pricing or a self-serve free trial before buying; Small engineering teams with no dedicated AppSec owner to triage and remediate findings; Buyers looking for a low-cost standalone linter rather than an enterprise platformNon-regulated businesses with no financial crime or lending compliance obligation; Buyers looking for a free or self-serve product; Teams that only need a core banking or payments platform

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSIntegrationNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackIntegrationNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recorded1998 (28 yrs)
HeadquartersAtlanta, USRaleigh, US
PhoneNot listedNot yet recorded
EmailNot listedNot yet recorded
Live chatNot listedNot yet recorded
Support portal / ticketsPlan not statedNot yet recorded
Community forumNot listedNot yet recorded
Help centre / docsPlan not statedNot yet recorded
Dedicated account managerPlan not statedNot yet recorded
In person / on-siteNot listedNot yet recorded
Support hours24/7Not yet recorded
Response timePremium Support: P1 in 2 hours, P2 in 4 hours. Standard Support: P1 in 6 hours, P2 in 12 hours.Not yet recorded

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflows; AI governance toolingNot yet recorded
Model keyVendor's keyNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$1/yr24d42d60d78d96dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 984 solutions.