Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Claris International Inc. logoClaris FileMaker

Claris International Inc.

4.0/5
123FormBuilder logo123FormBuilder

123FormBuilder

4.2/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-Value2–6 weeks for a first app (~30d)Same day (drag-and-drop, 3,000+ templates) (~1d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$300/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersStarter 5–10 users; Max 5–99 users; 100+ users via sales; single (unshared) license availableFree: 1 form, 10 fields; Starter: 20 fields, 3 rules; Individual: 5 forms, unlimited submissions
Implementation friction4/52/5
Friction meter
Best forTeams that need a custom app for a workflow no off-the-shelf product covers: scheduling, work orders, inventory, patient intake or field data collection.; Organizations with Apple-centric IT, or an existing FileMaker estate, that want a choice of cloud or self-hosted deployment.; Mid-market and departmental teams with a citizen developer, an internal developer or one of Claris's 1,400+ partners to build and maintain the app.; Security-sensitive buyers that need SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001 and 27018, field-level privilege sets and AES-256 encryption at rest.Teams that need HIPAA- or GDPR-compliant data collection without building custom software; Marketing, HR and operations teams replacing paper forms with automated digital workflows; Organisations embedding forms in websites and pushing submissions into Salesforce, HubSpot, Google Sheets or 4,000+ apps; Healthcare, education, government and financial-services departments collecting eSignatures and payments
Not forBuyers who want an off-the-shelf vertical SaaS product with no build effort.; Teams with no developer, no partner budget and no appetite to own an application lifecycle.; Companies that need native, pre-built connectors to every enterprise system out of the box.; Real-time, high-volume consumer-scale web applications.Teams needing deep custom application logic, databases or complex multistep internal tooling; Buyers who require SOC 2 Type 2 or FedRAMP before purchase; the vendor states it does not hold SOC 2 Type 2; High-volume marketing automation suites needing native email journeys and CRM pipelines

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedIntegration
AWSNativeNative
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedIntegration
Google WorkspaceIntegrationIntegration
Microsoft 365IntegrationIntegration
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Listed Listed
GDPR Not listed Listed
HIPAA Not listed Listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
CMMC Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNo caution

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded1987 (39 yrs)2008 (18 yrs)
HeadquartersNot recordedTimișoara, Romania
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailNot listedAll plans
Live chatNot listedAll plans
Support portal / ticketsPlan not statedNot listed
Community forumAll plansAll plans
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedEnterprise only
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedCommunity forum average response time: 1 hour 27 minutes

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflows; AI search; NLP automationNot yet recorded
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$2/yr$16/yr$95/yr$530/yr1d3d7d16d39dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1839 solutions.