Side-by-side compare
Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-ValueUnder 2 weeks, self-serve (~14d)2–4 weeks (~30d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNot published; large-team pricing is quote-basedEnterprise-wide agreements; no published seat tiers
Implementation friction2/52/5
Friction meter
Best forSecurity and engineering teams that want exploit-proven pentest findings instead of scanner noise; DevSecOps teams working in GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket or Azure DevOps who want security checks inside the pull request; Startups through Fortune 100 organisations that need continuous offensive testing without an annual manual engagement; Teams that must show auditors reproducible request/response evidence of a breach pathEnterprise SOCs with high alert volume across identity, cloud and EDR telemetry; Security leaders who want tier-1 triage, enrichment and investigation run by AI agents; Buyers who prefer an outcome-based service over another console to operate; Organisations that need faster investigation throughput without hiring more analysts
Not forBuyers who only want a traditional SAST/SCA tool and no autonomous attack simulation; Organisations without an engineering owner to triage and remediate findings; Federal agencies or GovCon firms that require FedRAMP or CMMC credentials (not evidenced); Non-technical departments looking for a fully managed human pentest consultancySmall teams with no dedicated security operations function; Buyers requiring publicly listed pricing before evaluation; Organisations that must keep all security data on-premises (no such deployment is documented)
Stack fit matrix
SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackIntegrationNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported
Compliance
SOC 2 Listed Listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
CMMC Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
Company & support
Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.
Founded2023 (3 yrs)2024 (2 yrs)
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot yet recorded
EmailPlan not statedNot yet recorded
Live chatNot listedNot yet recorded
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot yet recorded
Community forumNot listedNot yet recorded
Help centre / docsAll plansNot yet recorded
Dedicated account managerNot listedNot yet recorded
In person / on-siteNot listedNot yet recorded
Support hoursNot recordedNot yet recorded
Response timeNot statedNot yet recorded
AI & MCP readiness
Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.
MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflows; NLP automationAgentic workflows
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productAI-native
Trains on your dataNever trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onOpenAI, Anthropic, Open-weight modelsNot recorded
AI pricingIncluded in the planNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditFull audit trailNot recorded
Quadrant view
Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.
Quadrant view
Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)
The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.
Looking for more options? Browse all 2456 solutions.