Side-by-side compare
Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-ValueUnder a week to first scan (~3d)About 6 months for a multi-country rollout (~180d)
Typical annual TCO$5,400/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersStarter up to 5 users / 1 team; Standard up to 10 users / 1 team; Professional unlimited users across 2 teams; Enterprise unlimited users and teamsNot published; engagement scoped per country and employee count
Implementation friction2/54/5
Friction meter
Best forSecurity teams that must continuously map and test their full external attack surface; DevSecOps teams automating AppSec, API and internal scanning inside CI/CD pipelines; Organizations that want exploitability proof to cut vulnerability noise and false positives; Teams building agentic AI workflows that need deterministic security testing via MCP; Mid-market and enterprise security programmes that need PCI ASV scanning for PCI DSSMultinational employers running payroll in many countries who want one provider and one governance model; Companies consolidating multiple in-country payroll providers into a single global model; HR and finance teams that need payroll wired into HRIS/HCM systems such as Workday, UKG, HiBob, Sage People or Cornerstone; Organisations with internationally mobile staff needing assignment payroll, expat tax and mobility coordination
Not forTeams looking for source-code review (SAST) or IDE-level secure coding tooling; Buyers seeking endpoint, email or cloud-workload protection rather than external AppSec; Procurement teams that require vendor-published SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence (none found on its trust pages); Organizations with no one available to triage and remediate findings; Very small teams that want a single all-in-one security platformSingle-country employers with simple domestic payroll needs; Buyers who want self-serve payroll software with no managed-service layer; Teams that require published, self-checkout pricing before evaluation; Very small headcounts where a global managed payroll model is disproportionate
Stack fit matrix
SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSIntegrationNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)NativeNot supported
Compliance
SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff
Company & support
Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.
Founded2013 (13 yrs)2001 (25 yrs)
HeadquartersStockholm, SwedenNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailAll plansNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot listed
Community forumNot listedNot listed
Help centre / docsAll plansNot listed
Dedicated account managerEnterprise onlyPlan not stated
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated
AI & MCP readiness
Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.
MCP connectionreaches AI clientsOfficial serverNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflowsNot yet recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded
Quadrant view
Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.
Quadrant view
Typical annual cost × Time-to-value
The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.
Looking for more options? Browse all 984 solutions.