Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Everhour logoEverhour

Everhour

4.7/5
360Learning logo360Learning

360Learning

4.7/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-ValueLive in days; ROI typically 2-3 weeks (~3d)2–4 weeks (~21d)
Typical annual TCO$2,550/yr$9,600/yr
Starting price$510/yr$96/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersFree: up to 5 seats. Team: minimum 5 seats. Custom: minimum 50 seats with volume discounts.No minimum number of users; Team plan covers up to 100 users; Business and Enterprise scale by contract.
Implementation friction1/52/5
Friction meter
Best forAgencies and consultancies that bill clients by the hour and need estimates vs actuals per project; Teams already using Asana, ClickUp, Jira, Basecamp, Monday, Trello, Linear or Notion that want a time layer without switching tools; Delivery and finance leads who need budget alerts, utilisation reporting and invoice-ready time data; Small teams of roughly 5-50 seats that want one flat per-seat price with every feature included; Companies that change project management tools often and need time history to survive the moveL&D teams that need to scale expert-authored content without a large instructional-design department; Enterprises consolidating several legacy LMS/LXP tools into one platform under a single contract; Global, multilingual workforces needing AI translation, mobile delivery and consistent compliance training; HR organisations that want Workday, SAP SuccessFactors or BambooHR data to auto-enrol learners
Not forTeams that do not track or bill time and find a built-in PM timer sufficient; Enterprises that require vendor-held SOC 2, ISO 27001 or FedRAMP attestations; Buyers looking for a full project management suite, resource planning or Gantt scheduling; Fixed-price product teams with no hourly rates or client invoicing needsBuyers who want transparent, published per-seat pricing above 100 users; Business and Enterprise are custom-quoted; Teams that mainly want a large third-party off-the-shelf course library rather than internally authored content; Organisations requiring certifications such as FedRAMP or HIPAA that the vendor does not publish

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceIntegrationIntegration
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotIntegrationNot supported
Google WorkspaceIntegrationNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedIntegration
SAPNot supportedIntegration
SlackNativeIntegration
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Not listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNot checked yet

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2015 (11 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersMinsk, BelarusNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailAll plansNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot listed
Community forumNot listedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsNot listedAll plans
Dedicated account managerEnterprise onlyEnterprise only
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresNot yet recordedCopilot / assistant; AI search; NLP automation
Built around AI?Not recordedNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

1.0/51.2/51.5/51.8/52.1/54.9/54.8/54.7/54.6/54.4/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1450 solutions.