Side-by-side compare
Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-ValueSame day — ~5 minutes to first review (~1d)2–4 weeks (~30d)
Typical annual TCO$9,000/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersStarter: 1 active developer, free. Pro: unlimited seats, billed per seat. Enterprise: custom.Enterprise-wide agreements; no published seat tiers
Implementation friction1/52/5
Friction meter
Best forEngineering teams with high pull-request volume that want review findings in minutes and fewer bugs reaching production; Enterprises in regulated sectors that need self-hosted or air-gapped AI code review; Organizations running several coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Devin) that want one validation layer for all code changes; Teams that want security review, including dependency scanning and exploit detection, on every pull requestEnterprise SOCs with high alert volume across identity, cloud and EDR telemetry; Security leaders who want tier-1 triage, enrichment and investigation run by AI agents; Buyers who prefer an outcome-based service over another console to operate; Organisations that need faster investigation throughput without hiring more analysts
Not forTeams that do not host code on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gitea, Perforce or Cursor Origin; Non-engineering functions looking for a general-purpose AI assistant or document workflow tool; Buyers who require FedRAMP, CMMC or a published HIPAA BAA from the vendorSmall teams with no dedicated security operations function; Buyers requiring publicly listed pricing before evaluation; Organisations that must keep all security data on-premises (no such deployment is documented)
Stack fit matrix
SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSIntegrationNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)NativeNot supported
Compliance
SOC 2 Listed Listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
CMMC Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
Company & support
Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.
FoundedNot recorded2024 (2 yrs)
HeadquartersNot recordedNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot yet recorded
EmailNot listedNot yet recorded
Live chatEnterprise onlyNot yet recorded
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot yet recorded
Community forumNot listedNot yet recorded
Help centre / docsAll plansNot yet recorded
Dedicated account managerNot listedNot yet recorded
In person / on-siteNot listedNot yet recorded
Support hoursNot recordedNot yet recorded
Response timeNot statedNot yet recorded
AI & MCP readiness
Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.
MCP connectionreaches AI clientsOfficial serverNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflowsAgentic workflows
Built around AI?AI-nativeAI-native
Trains on your dataTrains by default; you can opt outNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onOpenAI, AnthropicNot recorded
AI pricingBilled by usage or creditsNot recorded
Model keyEitherNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded
Quadrant view
Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.
Quadrant view
Typical annual cost × Time-to-value
The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.
Looking for more options? Browse all 2370 solutions.