Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Linxup logoLinxup

Linxup

4.0/5
360Learning logo360Learning

360Learning

4.7/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-ValueSame day (minutes to first tracking) (~1d)2–4 weeks (~21d)
Typical annual TCO$6,000/yr$9,600/yr
Starting price$300/yr$96/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNo seat minimum; priced per tracked vehicle, asset or device. Volume and bundle pricing available; 5+ devices on a 3-year contract can qualify for free hardware and 20% off service.No minimum number of users; Team plan covers up to 100 users; Business and Enterprise scale by contract.
Implementation friction1/52/5
Friction meter
Best forSmall and mid-sized field service fleets (HVAC, plumbing, landscaping, pest control, construction) that want vehicles, assets and tools tracked in one app; Buyers who want published per-vehicle pricing and no-contract options instead of 'call for a quote' enterprise contracts; Fleets that need dash cams, rear-facing cameras and driver coaching to reduce claims and win disputed accidents; Operations that need proof-of-service, geofencing and job-site arrival/departure documentation; US trucking and transport fleets that need FMCSA hours-of-service ELD alongside GPS trackingL&D teams that need to scale expert-authored content without a large instructional-design department; Enterprises consolidating several legacy LMS/LXP tools into one platform under a single contract; Global, multilingual workforces needing AI translation, mobile delivery and consistent compliance training; HR organisations that want Workday, SAP SuccessFactors or BambooHR data to auto-enrol learners
Not forLarge enterprises wanting a deeply customisable, API-first telematics data platform; Buyers seeking a software-only tool with no hardware installation; Teams wanting a fully AI-native analytics product rather than device-centric fleet tracking; Fleets operating outside the US and Canada, where coverage and US-based support do not applyBuyers who want transparent, published per-seat pricing above 100 users; Business and Enterprise are custom-quoted; Teams that mainly want a large third-party off-the-shelf course library rather than internally authored content; Organisations requiring certifications such as FedRAMP or HIPAA that the vendor does not publish

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedIntegration
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedIntegration
SAPNot supportedIntegration
SlackNot supportedIntegration
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Not listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNot checked yet

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2004 (22 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersSt. Louis, USNot recorded
PhoneAll plansNot listed
EmailNot listedNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsAll plansNot listed
Community forumNot listedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedEnterprise only
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursBusiness hoursNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresNot yet recordedCopilot / assistant; AI search; NLP automation
Built around AI?Not recordedNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$6k/yr$7k/yr$8k/yr$9k/yr$10k/yr1d2d6d12d26dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1546 solutions.