Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Manhattan Associates, Inc. logoManhattan Active WM

Manhattan Associates, Inc.

4.2/5
360Learning logo360Learning

360Learning

4.7/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-Value6-12 months (phased site rollout) (~180d)2–4 weeks (~21d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$9,600/yr
Starting price$0/yr$96/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNot published; enterprise contracts scoped per site, volume and moduleNo minimum number of users; Team plan covers up to 100 users; Business and Enterprise scale by contract.
Implementation friction4/52/5
Friction meter
Best forLarge retailers, distributors, manufacturers and 3PLs running multi-site, high-volume warehouse and fulfillment networks; Companies replacing a legacy WMS with a cloud-native, microservices platform and an evergreen upgrade model; Operations that want warehouse, transportation, order and store execution on one shared data model; Retailers pushing omnichannel fulfillment: ship-from-store, store inventory and POS in one stack; Supply chain teams ready to adopt autonomous AI agents and AI-driven demand forecasting and allocationL&D teams that need to scale expert-authored content without a large instructional-design department; Enterprises consolidating several legacy LMS/LXP tools into one platform under a single contract; Global, multilingual workforces needing AI translation, mobile delivery and consistent compliance training; HR organisations that want Workday, SAP SuccessFactors or BambooHR data to auto-enrol learners
Not forSmall businesses or single-site warehouses without dedicated IT and operations staff; Buyers looking for low-cost, self-serve software they can deploy in days; Companies that want a standalone point tool rather than a unified platform across planning and execution; Organizations unwilling to commit to a structured enterprise implementation and change programBuyers who want transparent, published per-seat pricing above 100 users; Business and Enterprise are custom-quoted; Teams that mainly want a large third-party off-the-shelf course library rather than internally authored content; Organisations requiring certifications such as FedRAMP or HIPAA that the vendor does not publish

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedIntegration
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedIntegration
SAPNot supportedIntegration
SlackNot supportedIntegration
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Not listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNot checked yet

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded1990 (36 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersAtlanta, USNot recorded
PhoneAll plansNot listed
EmailPlan not statedNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsAll plansNot listed
Community forumNot listedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsNot listedAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedEnterprise only
In person / on-sitePlan not statedNot listed
Support hours24/7Not recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflows; Predictive analyticsCopilot / assistant; AI search; NLP automation
Built around AI?AI-nativeNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$5/yr$97/yr$2k/yr$24k/yr5d53d101d140d190dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1498 solutions.