Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Noma Security logoNoma Security

Noma Security

4.0/5
6clicks logo6clicks

6clicks

4.0/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-Value2–4 weeks (~30d)2-6 weeks (vendor: weeks, not months) (~30d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersCustom enterprise agreements; pricing not publishedNo seat tiers: unlimited users on every plan; Advisor/MSP licensing is bought as Assessment-Only or Full Feature Spokes.
Implementation friction3/53/5
Friction meter
Best forEnterprises rolling out LLMs, RAG applications, and AI agents that need discovery, policy enforcement, and runtime protection in one platform.; CISOs and security teams facing shadow AI, prompt injection, or agent scope violations that endpoint and network controls cannot see.; Regulated organizations that need audit-ready evidence and session-level context for AI governance and compliance reviews.; Companies standardizing on Claude Enterprise, Claude Code, or MCP-based agents and needing governed visibility into that usage.; Security teams that want policy defined once and enforced at existing control points (agent hooks, MCP/AI gateways, SDKs, APIs) instead of one gateway.Government agencies and regulators needing sovereign data residency and AI that runs inside their own boundary.; Defense contractors and critical infrastructure operators with air-gapped, segmented or OT environments.; Complex multi-entity enterprises running many frameworks across distributed business units.; Advisors, MSPs and vCISO providers delivering white-label GRC services to many clients from one hub.; Security, risk and compliance teams that must keep ISO 27001, NIST CSF, DORA, SOC 2, Essential Eight or IRAP obligations audit-ready.
Not forSmall teams or startups with little AI or agent adoption; value scales with the size of the AI estate.; Buyers wanting a low-cost self-serve tool; Noma is sold as an enterprise platform through a demo.; Teams expecting inline blocking of Claude Enterprise activity; the Compliance API connector is monitoring only by design.; Organizations that want a single chokepoint gateway for all AI traffic rather than distributed enforcement.Startups and small businesses looking for a cheap self-serve checklist tool.; Teams that only need a single framework and have no multi-entity or sovereign requirements.; Organizations unwilling to run structured onboarding and Hub & Spoke configuration.; Buyers who need a published self-checkout list price before talking to sales.

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSIntegrationNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Custom buildNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Listed Listed
GDPR Listed Not listed
HIPAA Listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
CMMC Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Listed Listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNo caution

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
HeadquartersNew York, USNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailNot listedNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedPlan not stated
Community forumNot listedAll plans
Help centre / docsNot listedAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedAll plans
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeTypically within one business day (security questions)Not stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsCustom buildNot supported
AI featuresAI governance tooling; Agentic workflows; Anomaly detectionCopilot / assistant; Document processing; NLP automation; Agentic workflows; AI governance tooling
Built around AI?Not recordedAI added to an existing product
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNever trains on your data
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedIncluded in the plan
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

2.4/52.7/53.0/53.3/53.6/54.3/54.1/54.0/53.9/53.7/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 2416 solutions.