Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Reclaim.ai, Inc. logoReclaim.ai

Reclaim.ai, Inc.

4.5/5
360Learning logo360Learning

360Learning

4.7/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-Value1–2 weeks (self-serve, free plan) (~14d)2–4 weeks (~21d)
Typical annual TCO$18,000/yr$9,600/yr
Starting price$0/yr$96/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersFree 1-user team; Starter up to 10 seats; Business up to 100 seats; Enterprise over 100 seatsNo minimum number of users; Team plan covers up to 100 users; Business and Enterprise scale by contract.
Implementation friction1/52/5
Friction meter
Best forTeams on Google Calendar or Outlook that want AI to defend focus time and deep work automatically; Managers and HR leaders who need visibility into meeting load, fragmentation, and burnout risk; Sales, marketing, and EA teams that want scheduling links, delegated access, and faster meeting booking; Individuals who want a free, self-serve AI calendar that schedules tasks, habits, and breaks; Enterprises rolling out company-wide focus-time or no-meeting-day initiativesL&D teams that need to scale expert-authored content without a large instructional-design department; Enterprises consolidating several legacy LMS/LXP tools into one platform under a single contract; Global, multilingual workforces needing AI translation, mobile delivery and consistent compliance training; HR organisations that want Workday, SAP SuccessFactors or BambooHR data to auto-enrol learners
Not forOrganizations that do not run on Google Calendar or Outlook as their primary calendar; Buyers looking for a full workforce analytics or employee-monitoring suite rather than calendar automation; Users who prefer fully manual time blocking with no automated reschedulingBuyers who want transparent, published per-seat pricing above 100 users; Business and Enterprise are custom-quoted; Teams that mainly want a large third-party off-the-shelf course library rather than internally authored content; Organisations requiring certifications such as FedRAMP or HIPAA that the vendor does not publish

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedIntegration
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNativeNot supported
Microsoft 365NativeIntegration
SAPNot supportedIntegration
SlackNativeIntegration
MCP (Model Context Protocol)NativeNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNot checked yet

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
HeadquartersNot recordedNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailPlan not statedNot listed
Live chatPlan not statedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot listed
Community forumNot listedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedEnterprise only
In person / on-siteEnterprise onlyNot listed
Support hoursBusiness hoursNot recorded
Response timeTypically under 1 hour during support hours; under 20 minutes average for live chat and emailNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsOfficial serverNot supported
AI featuresCopilot / assistant; Agentic workflows; Predictive analytics; Document processingCopilot / assistant; AI search; NLP automation
Built around AI?AI-nativeNot recorded
Trains on your dataOnly if you opt inNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingIncluded in the planNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

1.0/51.2/51.5/51.8/52.1/54.8/54.7/54.6/54.5/54.3/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1450 solutions.