Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Semgrep, Inc. logoSemgrep

Semgrep, Inc.

4.0/5
Abrigo logoAbrigo

Abrigo

4.0/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-ValueAbout a week to first scans in CI (~7d)~3 months (estimated) (~90d)
Typical annual TCO$18,000/yr$0/yr
Starting price$360/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersFree Edition caps at 10 contributors and 10 private repositories; Teams up to 500 private repositories; Enterprise unlimited contributors and repositories.Not published; licensed at the institution level
Implementation friction2/54/5
Friction meter
Best forEngineering and AppSec teams that want SAST, SCA and secrets scanning unified in one high-signal platform; Security teams overwhelmed by false positives; the vendor reports 80% fewer triaged false positives; Organizations moving off legacy AppSec vendors such as Checkmarx or Snyk; Developer-first teams that want fixes delivered in PRs, CI/CD, IDEs and AI coding agents; Fintech and SaaS companies mitigating open-source supply chain and dependency riskCommunity banks and credit unions managing AML/CFT and fraud risk; Institutions that need lending, credit risk, and CECL portfolio reporting in one suite; BSA/AML and compliance teams facing FFIEC and regulatory examination pressure; Banks wanting CRM, marketing, and analytics alongside risk tooling
Not forTeams with no developers, source control or CI/CD pipeline to scan; Buyers wanting a fully managed, no-code security service; Sub-10-developer shops that outgrow the free tier and want flat-rate pricing; Organizations that need publicly documented FedRAMP or HIPAA coverage before purchaseNon-regulated businesses with no financial crime or lending compliance obligation; Buyers looking for a free or self-serve product; Teams that only need a core banking or payments platform

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackIntegrationNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)NativeNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2017 (9 yrs)1998 (28 yrs)
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USRaleigh, US
PhoneNot listedNot yet recorded
EmailNot listedNot yet recorded
Live chatNot listedNot yet recorded
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot yet recorded
Community forumAll plansNot yet recorded
Help centre / docsAll plansNot yet recorded
Dedicated account managerEnterprise onlyNot yet recorded
In person / on-siteNot listedNot yet recorded
Support hoursNot recordedNot yet recorded
Response timeNot statedNot yet recorded

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsOfficial serverNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflowsNot yet recorded
Model keyEitherNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$6/yr$133/yr$3k/yr$47k/yr5d13d26d54d110dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 984 solutions.