Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Semgrep, Inc. logoSemgrep

Semgrep, Inc.

4.0/5
activpayroll logoactivpayroll

activpayroll

4.0/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-ValueAbout a week to first scans in CI (~7d)About 6 months for a multi-country rollout (~180d)
Typical annual TCO$18,000/yr$0/yr
Starting price$360/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersFree Edition caps at 10 contributors and 10 private repositories; Teams up to 500 private repositories; Enterprise unlimited contributors and repositories.Not published; engagement scoped per country and employee count
Implementation friction2/54/5
Friction meter
Best forEngineering and AppSec teams that want SAST, SCA and secrets scanning unified in one high-signal platform; Security teams overwhelmed by false positives; the vendor reports 80% fewer triaged false positives; Organizations moving off legacy AppSec vendors such as Checkmarx or Snyk; Developer-first teams that want fixes delivered in PRs, CI/CD, IDEs and AI coding agents; Fintech and SaaS companies mitigating open-source supply chain and dependency riskMultinational employers running payroll in many countries who want one provider and one governance model; Companies consolidating multiple in-country payroll providers into a single global model; HR and finance teams that need payroll wired into HRIS/HCM systems such as Workday, UKG, HiBob, Sage People or Cornerstone; Organisations with internationally mobile staff needing assignment payroll, expat tax and mobility coordination
Not forTeams with no developers, source control or CI/CD pipeline to scan; Buyers wanting a fully managed, no-code security service; Sub-10-developer shops that outgrow the free tier and want flat-rate pricing; Organizations that need publicly documented FedRAMP or HIPAA coverage before purchaseSingle-country employers with simple domestic payroll needs; Buyers who want self-serve payroll software with no managed-service layer; Teams that require published, self-checkout pricing before evaluation; Very small headcounts where a global managed payroll model is disproportionate

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackIntegrationNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)NativeNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2017 (9 yrs)2001 (25 yrs)
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailNot listedNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot listed
Community forumAll plansNot listed
Help centre / docsAll plansNot listed
Dedicated account managerEnterprise onlyPlan not stated
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsOfficial serverNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflowsNot yet recorded
Model keyEitherNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$6/yr$133/yr$3k/yr$47k/yr5d14d37d95d240dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 984 solutions.