Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Skedulo Holdings, Inc. logoSkedulo

Skedulo Holdings, Inc.

4.1/5
360Learning logo360Learning

360Learning

4.7/5
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-Value6–8 weeks (~45d)2–4 weeks (~21d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$9,600/yr
Starting price$0/yr$96/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNo published tiers; user counts can be adjusted mid-contract with prorated billing.No minimum number of users; Team plan covers up to 100 users; Business and Enterprise scale by contract.
Implementation friction4/52/5
Friction meter
Best forHealthcare and home-care providers coordinating hundreds of mobile clinicians, caregivers or therapists.; Field service and residential service businesses scheduling large volumes of jobs across many locations.; Organizations with 1,000+ deskless workers that need centralized scheduling, dispatch and tracking.; Salesforce customers that want a native scheduling, dispatch and mobile-app layer on top of their CRM.; Nonprofits and public sector teams scheduling trainers, volunteers, inspectors or field staff.L&D teams that need to scale expert-authored content without a large instructional-design department; Enterprises consolidating several legacy LMS/LXP tools into one platform under a single contract; Global, multilingual workforces needing AI translation, mobile delivery and consistent compliance training; HR organisations that want Workday, SAP SuccessFactors or BambooHR data to auto-enrol learners
Not forSmall teams wanting self-serve signup, published per-seat pricing or monthly billing (Skedulo does not offer monthly billing).; Buyers who want a zero-configuration tool with no implementation or professional services effort.; Businesses whose staff are all desk-based and do not need mobile scheduling or dispatch.; Consumer-style one-off appointment booking with no workforce or resource management.Buyers who want transparent, published per-seat pricing above 100 users; Business and Enterprise are custom-quoted; Teams that mainly want a large third-party off-the-shelf course library rather than internally authored content; Organisations requiring certifications such as FedRAMP or HIPAA that the vendor does not publish

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNativeIntegration
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedIntegration
SAPNot supportedIntegration
SlackNot supportedIntegration
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Not listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNot checked yet

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailNot listedNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsAll plansNot listed
Community forumNot listedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedEnterprise only
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hours24/7Not recorded
Response timeDefined response times included with every license; additional support packages available.Not stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresNot yet recordedCopilot / assistant; AI search; NLP automation
Built around AI?Not recordedNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)

1.8/52.4/53.0/53.6/54.2/54.7/54.5/54.4/54.3/54.1/5Friction ← betterBuyer score better →Loved & EasyLoved & HeavyRisky & EasyRisky & Heavy

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1546 solutions.