Side-by-side compare
Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.
ROI categoryops efficiencyops efficiency
Time-to-Value1-2 weeks after Jira app install (~14d)2–4 weeks (~21d)
Typical annual TCO$7,188/yr$9,600/yr
Starting price$120/yr$96/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiers$10.00/user/mo for 1-10 (flat fee); $5.99 at 11-100; $1.99 at 251-1,000; $0.28 at 15,000+ usersNo minimum number of users; Team plan covers up to 100 users; Business and Enterprise scale by contract.
Implementation friction2/52/5
Friction meter
Best forJira- and Atlassian-centric enterprises that want automated time tracking inside existing Jira workflows; Organizations that bill clients or capitalize R&D and need billable hours, accounts and approval workflows; Teams needing team- and project-level timesheet approvals with period locking; Companies that want time data combined with capacity, financial and portfolio views via other Tempo apps; Engineering teams whose developers should log time from IDEs, Git, Slack, calendars or mobileL&D teams that need to scale expert-authored content without a large instructional-design department; Enterprises consolidating several legacy LMS/LXP tools into one platform under a single contract; Global, multilingual workforces needing AI translation, mobile delivery and consistent compliance training; HR organisations that want Workday, SAP SuccessFactors or BambooHR data to auto-enrol learners
Not forTeams that do not use Jira - Timesheets is a Jira Cloud and Data Center app; Individual freelancers looking for a free standalone tracker; Buyers wanting one all-in-one PSA or ERP suite without Atlassian ecosystem add-ons; Organizations requiring published AI model, key-management or AI audit documentationBuyers who want transparent, published per-seat pricing above 100 users; Business and Enterprise are custom-quoted; Teams that mainly want a large third-party off-the-shelf course library rather than internally authored content; Organisations requiring certifications such as FedRAMP or HIPAA that the vendor does not publish
Stack fit matrix
SalesforceNot supportedIntegration
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceIntegrationNot supported
Microsoft 365IntegrationIntegration
SAPNot supportedIntegration
SlackIntegrationIntegration
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported
Compliance
SOC 2 Listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Listed Not listed
GDPR Listed Not listed
HIPAA Listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
Company & support
Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.
Founded2007 (19 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersBoston, USNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailNot listedNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsAll plansNot listed
Community forumNot listedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedEnterprise only
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated
AI & MCP readiness
Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.
MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresCopilot / assistantCopilot / assistant; AI search; NLP automation
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded
Quadrant view
Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.
Quadrant view
Typical annual cost × Time-to-value
The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.
Looking for more options? Browse all 1450 solutions.