Side-by-side compare
Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-Value2-4 weeks for platform rollout (~30d)~3 months (estimated) (~90d)
Typical annual TCO$6,790/yr$0/yr
Starting price$3,500/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersPublished entry tiers: 100 assets at $3,500/yr, or 5 FQDNs at $3,578/yr; larger estates quoted by Tenable or a partner.Not published; licensed at the institution level
Implementation friction3/54/5
Friction meter
Best forLarge enterprises and government agencies that need one platform to find, prioritise and fix exposures across IT, cloud, identity, OT and AI.; Security teams consolidating point vulnerability scanners into risk-based, cross-domain exposure management.; Organisations with heavy audit and compliance obligations (TISAX/ENX, EU AI Act alignment) that need evidence-backed reporting.; Industrial and critical-infrastructure operators needing passive OT/IoT asset discovery and vulnerability detection.; Multi-cloud teams wanting agentless CNAPP/CSPM coverage alongside vulnerability management.Community banks and credit unions managing AML/CFT and fraud risk; Institutions that need lending, credit risk, and CECL portfolio reporting in one suite; BSA/AML and compliance teams facing FFIEC and regulatory examination pressure; Banks wanting CRM, marketing, and analytics alongside risk tooling
Not forSmall businesses looking for a free or low-cost standalone vulnerability scanner.; Buyers who want instant self-serve signup with published per-seat pricing and no sales cycle.; Teams that only ever need a single-domain scanner and no platform consolidation.; Organisations unwilling to run agents or credentialed scans across their estate.Non-regulated businesses with no financial crime or lending compliance obligation; Buyers looking for a free or self-serve product; Teams that only need a core banking or payments platform
Stack fit matrix
SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNativeNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365IntegrationNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported
Compliance
SOC 2 Not listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
Company & support
Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.
Founded2002 (24 yrs)1998 (28 yrs)
HeadquartersColumbia, USRaleigh, US
PhonePlan not statedNot yet recorded
EmailPlan not statedNot yet recorded
Live chatPlan not statedNot yet recorded
Support portal / ticketsPlan not statedNot yet recorded
Community forumPlan not statedNot yet recorded
Help centre / docsPlan not statedNot yet recorded
Dedicated account managerNot listedNot yet recorded
In person / on-siteNot listedNot yet recorded
Support hours24/7Not yet recorded
Response timeNot statedNot yet recorded
AI & MCP readiness
Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.
MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflows; AI governance toolingNot yet recorded
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onAnthropicNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyVendor's keyNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded
Quadrant view
Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.
Quadrant view
Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)
The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.
Looking for more options? Browse all 1182 solutions.