Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Xactly Corporation logoXactly

Xactly Corporation

4.3/5
AdvancedMD, Inc. logoAdvancedMD

AdvancedMD, Inc.

4.0/5
ROI categoryrevenue velocityrevenue velocity
Time-to-ValueTypically 2-4 months (~90d)2-3 months (~60d)
Typical annual TCO$120,000/yr$0/yr
Starting price$30,000/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersThree editions - Core, Plus, Ultimate; no self-service trialNot published; quotes are scoped to practice size and product mix
Implementation friction4/53/5
Friction meter
Best forMid-market and enterprise sales organizations running complex, multi-plan incentive compensation; Teams consolidating commissions, quota, territory and forecasting onto one platform; Global companies that need ASC 606 commission expense accounting and auditable pay data; Revenue leaders who want to benchmark comp plans against 20+ years of industry pay dataIndependent and group medical practices that want EHR, practice management and patient engagement in one cloud suite; Billing companies and RCM partners handling high claim volumes; Multi-location practices needing consolidated clinical and financial reporting; Practices that prefer vendor-run implementation, training and managed billing over self-serve tooling
Not forSmall teams wanting a self-serve, low-cost commissions calculator (no free trial is offered); Companies unwilling to commit to a guided implementation project; Organizations that require published, transparent list pricing before evaluating; Businesses with no quota-carrying sales teamNon-healthcare businesses or general professional-services firms; Hospitals and academic health systems with complex inpatient or research workflows; Teams outside the United States, since the platform is built around US payors and billing; Buyers who require published, self-serve pricing before talking to sales

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceIntegrationNot supported
AWSNot supportedNative
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotIntegrationNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365IntegrationNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2
ISO 27001
GDPR
HIPAA
FedRAMP
ISO 42001
IAPP AIGPnamed staff

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2005 (21 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersLos Gatos, USSouth Jordan, US
PhonePlan not statedNot listed
EmailNot listedNot listed
Live chatNot listedPlan not stated
Support portal / ticketsPlan not statedPlan not stated
Community forumPlan not statedPlan not stated
Help centre / docsPlan not statedNot listed
Dedicated account managerPlan not statedPlan not stated
In person / on-siteNot listedPlan not stated
Support hoursNot recorded24/7
Response timeNot stated90-second average response time, no ticket queues (vendor claim)

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresCopilot / assistant; Agentic workflows; AI search; Predictive analyticsCopilot / assistant; Document processing
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$9/yr$345/yr$11k/yr$380k/yr57d66d75d84d93dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 792 solutions.