Side-by-side compare
Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.
ROI categorycost reductioncost reduction
Time-to-ValueInsights in days; 2–4 weeks full onboarding (~14d)~2-3 months (~60d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNot published; contracts are scoped by lanes, modes and user accessNot seat-based; priced per building / device footprint
Implementation friction2/53/5
Friction meter
Best forGlobal shippers with multi-million dollar ocean and air freight budgets; Freight forwarders and carriers that buy or sell containerized and air freight; Procurement teams running large ocean tenders and RFQs across many lanes; Supply chain and finance teams needing independent third-party freight benchmarks; Logistics providers that must prove price competitiveness to customersMulti-site offices, retail, education and hospitality portfolios that want HVAC energy savings without a full controls rip-and-replace.; Facilities teams that prefer an IoT BMS with pre-packaged sequences, wireless sensors and cloud analytics over a traditional BMS project.; Contractors and energy service companies that install and commission building controls themselves rather than subcontracting.; Owners with carbon, sustainability or indoor-air-quality targets who need measurable, verifiable savings.
Not forSmall businesses with low freight volumes and no dedicated procurement function; Teams moving only domestic road or parcel freight (the platform covers ocean and air); Buyers wanting a cheap self-serve tool with published list pricing; Companies looking for a TMS or freight execution system rather than market dataIndustrial process control or life-safety systems that need PLC/DCS-grade determinism and certification.; Buyers who want a software-only analytics product with no hardware, wiring or commissioning.; Teams that need a public, self-serve price list and online sign-up; 75F pricing is quoted per project.; Companies wanting to assemble their own controls stack on an open, API-first platform.
Stack fit matrix
SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNativeNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported
Compliance
SOC 2 Not listed Listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
CMMC Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
Company & support
Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.
FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
HeadquartersOslo, NorwayNot recorded
PhoneNot listedPlan not stated
EmailNot listedPlan not stated
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedNot listed
Community forumNot listedNot listed
Help centre / docsPlan not statedPlan not stated
Dedicated account managerNot listedNot listed
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeWithin one business day (stated for inquiries)Not stated
AI & MCP readiness
Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.
MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAnomaly detection; Predictive analyticsCopilot / assistant; Predictive analytics; Anomaly detection
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded
Quadrant view
Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.
Quadrant view
Implementation friction × Value-Position score (estimate)
The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.
Looking for more options? Browse all 1839 solutions.