Skip to main content
Britive logo
Risk & ComplianceEstablished · 1 yrs on market

Britive

Runtime privileged access for AI agents, NHIs and humans

By Britive · HQ Glendale, US · 4.0/5 Value-Position score (estimate)

Positioning guardrails

Best for

  • Enterprise security and IAM teams replacing standing privilege with just-in-time, zero standing privilege access
  • Cloud and DevSecOps teams managing privileged access across AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI and Kubernetes
  • Security leaders who must govern and prove what AI agents and non-human identities are allowed to do
  • Organizations modernizing full-stack PAM without hosting vault servers, proxies or DR duplicates

Ideal size: 500+ employees people · Enterprise with multi-cloud, Kubernetes and DevSecOps teams

Not for

  • Small teams with no cloud estate and no dedicated identity or security function
  • Buyers who require an on-premises-only deployment — Britive is delivered as SaaS
  • Teams looking for a simple shared-password or credential vault rather than runtime access control
  • Organizations needing OT/ICS or industrial control system protection

Value metrics scorecard

Time-to-Value

2–4 weeks

~30 days to first production value

Total Cost of Ownership

On request

Enterprise subscription quoted through sales; no public list price

Implementation Friction

2/5

Engineering + admin effort required

Value-Position score

4.0

out of 5 · model estimate

Full cost breakdown

Mandatory implementation fee

None

Seat tiers

Not published

Add-on costs

  • None

Company & support

Who is behind Britive, and how your team gets help once it is live.

Company

Founded
Not recorded
Headquarters
Glendale, US

How you get support

  • PhoneNot listed
  • EmailNot listed
  • Live chatNot listed
  • Support portal / ticketsPlan not stated
  • Community forumNot listed
  • Help centre / docsNot listed
  • Dedicated account managerNot listed
  • In person / on-siteNot listed
Hours
Not recorded
Response time
Not stated

The vendor contact page points platform users to a 'Contact support' route. No support tiers, hours or published SLA. Demo and pricing requests are sales contacts, not support.

“Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention that channel, not that it is unavailable. Ask about it during evaluation.

Market position

Where Britive sits against its closest alternatives. Pick any two of cost, speed, friction and buyer score, and up to 9 companies to compare.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$1/yr11d21d30d31d33dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & PriceyBritiveVezaFlagrightZampArena PLMOneTrust

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line. A dashed ring marks an outlier pinned to the edge; hover for its value.

Britive is outlined. Click any dot to open its dossier.

Companies on the chart 6 / 10

  • Britive
  • Veza
  • Flagright
  • Zamp
  • Arena PLM
  • OneTrust
Add or change companies

Up to 10 companies including Britive. Listed closest first.

Stack fit signal

Compatibility with standard B2B ecosystems.

MCPNot supported

No supported MCP path today, so it cannot be driven from an AI client.

SalesforceIntegration
AWSNative
SnowflakeIntegration
HubSpotNot supported
Google WorkspaceIntegration
Microsoft 365Integration
SAPNot supported
SlackIntegration

AI & MCP readiness

What Britive ships in AI, and what it asks of your ecosystem.

AI features shipped

AI added to an existing product
AI governance tooling

Britive ARC treats each AI agent as an identity with an owner, policies and a lifecycle, evaluates every action at runtime, and records the prompt, intent, decision and outcome as access happens. Sources do not state model providers, key handling or how AI is billed.

Your data & models

Trains on your data
Not recorded — ask the vendor
Runs on
Not recorded
AI pricing
Not recorded

In your ecosystem

AI connection
Not supported
Model key
Not recorded
AI usage audit
Full audit trail

Compliance attestations

SOC 2 — not listedISO 27001 — not listedGDPR — not listedHIPAA — not listedFedRAMP — not listedISO 42001 — not listedIAPP AIGP* — not listed

* IAPP AIGP certifies individuals, not products. It means named staff hold the credential — not that the platform does.

Bottom line

Britive is a cloud-native, API-first privileged access management platform built on just-in-time, zero standing privileges. One runtime control plane covers humans, non-human identities and AI agents (Britive ARC), authorizing each task at runtime and enforcing policy natively at the resource, with no proxy in the data path. Delivered as SaaS with agentless integrations across AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, Kubernetes, SaaS apps, databases and on-prem systems.

Frequently asked questions

How long does a Britive deployment take?

The vendor states deployments can be completed in weeks instead of years, with complete end-user adoption and no workflow workarounds. Britive is delivered as SaaS with agentless integrations; a lightweight connector is only needed where targets are not publicly reachable, such as an on-prem database or server.

Does Britive replace our existing PAM or credential vault?

Britive positions itself against vault-and-proxy PAM: access is created at request, scoped to the task and expired when the task ends, so there is nothing standing to vault or rotate, and enforcement happens natively at the resource rather than through a proxy in the data path. It does integrate with CyberArk, HashiCorp Vault, Azure Key Vault and AWS Secrets Manager.

How does Britive secure AI agents?

Britive ARC treats each agent as an identity with a human owner, policies and a lifecycle. Every action is evaluated at runtime, privilege is created for the task and removed when it ends, and the platform records the prompt, stated intent, identities, decision and outcome so a full agent run can be searched as one record rather than reconstructed.

What does Britive cost?

No public price list is published; Britive is sold as an enterprise subscription via a demo and pricing request, so annual cost depends on scope. The vendor argues for lower cost of ownership than traditional PAM because there are no vault servers, DR duplicates or rotation infrastructure to host, patch or license.