Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Hadrian Security B.V. logoHadrian

Hadrian Security B.V.

4.0/5
6clicks logo6clicks

6clicks

4.0/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-Value1–3 weeks (~14d)2-6 weeks (vendor: weeks, not months) (~30d)
Typical annual TCO$25,000/yr$0/yr
Starting price$1,350/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNot seat-based; Atlas priced on asset count, Nova priced per testNo seat tiers: unlimited users on every plan; Advisor/MSP licensing is bought as Assessment-Only or Full Feature Spokes.
Implementation friction2/53/5
Friction meter
Best forSecurity operations teams and CISOs at mid-size and large enterprises that need continuous external attack surface visibility; Teams that want to replace or supplement slow manual pentest engagements with on-demand agentic testing; Organisations drowning in CVE noise that need validated, exploitable findings backed by evidence; SOCs with an existing SIEM, SOAR or ticketing stack that want an API-first, outside-in risk feedGovernment agencies and regulators needing sovereign data residency and AI that runs inside their own boundary.; Defense contractors and critical infrastructure operators with air-gapped, segmented or OT environments.; Complex multi-entity enterprises running many frameworks across distributed business units.; Advisors, MSPs and vCISO providers delivering white-label GRC services to many clients from one hub.; Security, risk and compliance teams that must keep ISO 27001, NIST CSF, DORA, SOC 2, Essential Eight or IRAP obligations audit-ready.
Not forSmall companies with no dedicated security or SecOps function; Buyers looking for an inexpensive self-serve vulnerability scanner; Teams seeking internal network or endpoint protection rather than external exposure testing; Organisations unable to authorise testing of their own external digital assetsStartups and small businesses looking for a cheap self-serve checklist tool.; Teams that only need a single framework and have no multi-entity or sovereign requirements.; Organizations unwilling to run structured onboarding and Hub & Spoke configuration.; Buyers who need a published self-checkout list price before talking to sales.

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSIntegrationNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotIntegrationNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365IntegrationNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackIntegrationNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Not listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Listed
GDPR Listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
CMMC Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNo caution

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2021 (5 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersAmsterdam, NetherlandsNot recorded
PhoneNot yet recordedNot listed
EmailNot yet recordedNot listed
Live chatNot yet recordedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot yet recordedPlan not stated
Community forumNot yet recordedAll plans
Help centre / docsNot yet recordedAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot yet recordedAll plans
In person / on-siteNot yet recordedNot listed
Support hoursNot yet recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot yet recordedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflowsCopilot / assistant; Document processing; NLP automation; Agentic workflows; AI governance tooling
Built around AI?AI-nativeAI added to an existing product
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNever trains on your data
Runs onNot recordedNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedIncluded in the plan
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditFull audit trailNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$7/yr$157/yr$3k/yr$68k/yr13d18d22d26d31dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 2370 solutions.