Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

SoSafe SE logoSoSafe

SoSafe SE

4.5/5
Admin By Request logoAdmin By Request

Admin By Request

4.3/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-Value2–4 weeks (~30d)Hours to install; weeks to full rollout (~14d)
Typical annual TCO$30,000/yr$0/yr
Starting price$8,100/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersEntry plan covers 50 seats; users can be added mid-term and are billed for the remaining contract period; per-seat price falls as seat count growsFree plan for small deployments; paid tiers licensed by endpoint through sales, no published minimums.
Implementation friction2/52/5
Friction meter
Best forMid-market and enterprise security teams that must prove measurable behaviour change, not just training completion rates.; European organisations that need to evidence NIS2, DORA or ISO 27001 human-risk controls for auditors, boards and works councils.; Multinational workforces requiring training and simulations localised across 30+ languages and role-specific learning paths.; Security teams with heavy manual programme overhead; SoSafe targets roughly 10–15 minutes of weekly admin.IT and security teams that need to remove standing local admin rights without drowning the help desk in install requests.; Mid-market and enterprise organisations preparing for audits that demand least-privilege evidence and full audit logs.; Companies wanting one lightweight agent for endpoint privilege, browser control and remote/vendor access instead of several heavy tools.; Teams that value fast rollout: sub-3MB agent, installs in hours, and most customers need zero training.
Not forTeams wanting a free or fully self-serve tool: every plan is quoted, per-user, from around €625 per month.; Organisations seeking only a standalone phishing simulator without training, culture measurement or service wrap.; Buyers with US-only data-residency or FedRAMP-style federal requirements, which SoSafe does not evidence.Organisations that need a full privileged access management suite with credential vaulting for servers, databases and service accounts.; Buyers who require published list pricing before a demo; licensing is quoted by the vendor's sales team.; Teams looking for a broad AI platform; AI here is scoped to request auto-approval and a documentation chatbot.

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNativeNot supported
Microsoft 365NativeIntegration
SAPIntegrationNot supported
SlackNativeNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Not listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNo caution

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

FoundedNot recordedNot recorded
HeadquartersCologne, GermanyDenmark
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailAll plansNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedPaid plans
Community forumNot listedNot listed
Help centre / docsAll plansPlan not stated
Dedicated account managerEnterprise onlyNot listed
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresCopilot / assistant; Document processing; NLP automationAI search
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productAI added to an existing product
Trains on your dataNever trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onOpenAINot recorded
AI pricingPaid add-onNot recorded
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$7/yr$172/yr$4k/yr$84k/yr13d18d22d26d31dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1182 solutions.