Skip to main content

Side-by-side compare

Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.

Tenable Holdings, Inc. logoTenable

Tenable Holdings, Inc.

4.4/5
activpayroll logoactivpayroll

activpayroll

4.0/5
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-Value2-4 weeks for platform rollout (~30d)About 6 months for a multi-country rollout (~180d)
Typical annual TCO$6,790/yr$0/yr
Starting price$3,500/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersPublished entry tiers: 100 assets at $3,500/yr, or 5 FQDNs at $3,578/yr; larger estates quoted by Tenable or a partner.Not published; engagement scoped per country and employee count
Implementation friction3/54/5
Friction meter
Best forLarge enterprises and government agencies that need one platform to find, prioritise and fix exposures across IT, cloud, identity, OT and AI.; Security teams consolidating point vulnerability scanners into risk-based, cross-domain exposure management.; Organisations with heavy audit and compliance obligations (TISAX/ENX, EU AI Act alignment) that need evidence-backed reporting.; Industrial and critical-infrastructure operators needing passive OT/IoT asset discovery and vulnerability detection.; Multi-cloud teams wanting agentless CNAPP/CSPM coverage alongside vulnerability management.Multinational employers running payroll in many countries who want one provider and one governance model; Companies consolidating multiple in-country payroll providers into a single global model; HR and finance teams that need payroll wired into HRIS/HCM systems such as Workday, UKG, HiBob, Sage People or Cornerstone; Organisations with internationally mobile staff needing assignment payroll, expat tax and mobility coordination
Not forSmall businesses looking for a free or low-cost standalone vulnerability scanner.; Buyers who want instant self-serve signup with published per-seat pricing and no sales cycle.; Teams that only ever need a single-domain scanner and no platform consolidation.; Organisations unwilling to run agents or credentialed scans across their estate.Single-country employers with simple domestic payroll needs; Buyers who want self-serve payroll software with no managed-service layer; Teams that require published, self-checkout pricing before evaluation; Very small headcounts where a global managed payroll model is disproportionate

Stack fit matrix

SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNativeNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365IntegrationNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackNot supportedNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported

Compliance

SOC 2 Not listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Not listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Not listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
AI app-builder checkwhat this checksNo cautionNot checked yet

Company & support

Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.

Founded2002 (24 yrs)2001 (25 yrs)
HeadquartersColumbia, USNot recorded
PhonePlan not statedNot listed
EmailPlan not statedNot listed
Live chatPlan not statedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsPlan not statedNot listed
Community forumPlan not statedNot listed
Help centre / docsPlan not statedNot listed
Dedicated account managerNot listedPlan not stated
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hours24/7Not recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated

AI & MCP readiness

Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.

MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflows; AI governance toolingNot yet recorded
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productNot recorded
Trains on your dataNot recorded — ask the vendorNot recorded — ask the vendor
Runs onAnthropicNot recorded
AI pricingNot recordedNot recorded
Model keyVendor's keyNot recorded
AI usage auditNot recordedNot recorded

Quadrant view

Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$5/yr$81/yr$1k/yr$16k/yr15d60d105d150d190dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & Pricey

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Each dot is one of the solutions you're comparing. Click a dot to open the full profile.

Looking for more options? Browse all 1164 solutions.