Skip to main content
Reconstruct Inc logo
Risk & ComplianceFounded 2015 · 11 yrs

Reconstruct

Reconstruct brings the project site to decision-makers.

By Reconstruct Inc · HQ Menlo Park, US · 4.0/5 Value-Position score (estimate)

Positioning guardrails

Best for

  • General contractors and owners running multi-site capital programs who need remote quality control and progress verification
  • Owner's representatives who must document field progress without constant travel to the job site
  • Teams producing as-built digital twins for handover, renovation, or liability claims
  • VDC and BIM teams overlaying 2D/3D design against captured reality and sequencing work in 4D
  • Facilities and campus owners needing fast, measurable floor plans and 3D models

Ideal size: 10–200 project staff people · Mid-to-large GC or owner with a VDC/BIM function

Not for

  • Small residential remodelers with few or very short-duration jobs
  • Firms where nobody on site can walk a smartphone or 360 camera capture
  • Buyers looking for estimating, project accounting, or scheduling-of-record software
  • Organizations that require published self-serve pricing and instant online signup
  • Teams with no appetite for reality-capture hardware or upload workflows

Value metrics scorecard

Time-to-Value

About 1 month

~30 days to first production value

Total Cost of Ownership

On request

Custom, quote-based pricing per project or portfolio; pricing is not published publicly

Implementation Friction

3/5

Engineering + admin effort required

Value-Position score

4.0

out of 5 · model estimate

Full cost breakdown

Mandatory implementation fee

None

Seat tiers

Not published; sold by project or portfolio rather than by seat

Add-on costs

  • None

Company & support

Who is behind Reconstruct, and how your team gets help once it is live.

Company

Founded
2015 · 11 yrs in business
Headquarters
Menlo Park, US

How you get support

We haven’t recorded support channels for Reconstruct yet. Nothing here means unverified — not absent.

Market position

Where Reconstruct sits against its closest alternatives. Pick any two of cost, speed, friction and buyer score, and up to 9 companies to compare.

Quadrant view

Typical annual cost × Time-to-value

$0/yr$1/yr11d21d30d31d33dAnnual TCO ← betterDays to value better →Quick & CheapQuick & PriceySlow & CheapSlow & PriceyReconstructHammerTechSiteDocsDocument CrunchFootprintRaken

The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.

Reconstruct is outlined. Click any dot to open its dossier.

Companies on the chart 6 / 10

  • Reconstruct
  • HammerTech
  • SiteDocs
  • Document Crunch
  • Footprint
  • Raken
Add or change companies

Up to 10 companies including Reconstruct. Listed closest first.

Stack fit signal

Compatibility with standard B2B ecosystems.

MCPNot supported

No supported MCP path today, so it cannot be driven from an AI client.

SalesforceNot supported
AWSNot supported
SnowflakeNot supported
HubSpotNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supported
SAPNot supported
SlackNot supported

AI & MCP readiness

What Reconstruct ships in AI, and what it asks of your ecosystem.

We haven’t recorded AI capabilities for Reconstruct yet. Nothing here means unverified — not absent.

Compliance attestations

SOC 2 — not listedISO 27001 — not listedGDPR — not listedHIPAA — not listedFedRAMP — not listedCMMC — not listedISO 42001 — not listedIAPP AIGP* — not listed

* IAPP AIGP certifies individuals, not products. It means named staff hold the credential — not that the platform does.

Bottom line

Reconstruct is a construction reality-mapping and digital-twin platform. Site footage from smartphones, 360 cameras, or drones becomes measurable 2D floor plans and 3D models, then gets overlaid on design and schedule data inside the Visual Command Center. Owners, owner's representatives, and general contractors use it for remote quality control, progress monitoring, online as-builts, and facilities assessment, cutting site travel and rework. Pricing is quote-only. Founded in 2015 and headquartered in Menlo Park, California.

Frequently asked questions

How much does Reconstruct cost?

Reconstruct does not publish list pricing. The pricing page offers only 'Get Personalized Pricing' and asks buyers to contact the team, and the site frames packaging around a single project or hundreds of projects in a pipeline. Expect a custom quote scoped to your project or portfolio volume, so budget for a sales conversation before you can compare it line-by-line with seat-priced alternatives.

What equipment do we need to perform reality capture?

According to the vendor, virtually anyone on the job site can conduct a capture walk using equipment as simple as a smartphone or a 360 camera, and drones are also supported. Reconstruct's photogrammetry and reality-mapping engine positions photo and video footage in space and time, so heavy LiDAR scanners are not a prerequisite to get started.

Does Reconstruct replace our project management or accounting software?

No. Reconstruct positions itself as a reality-mapping and progress-monitoring layer over your existing project data. It ingests design and schedule information, integrates with construction platforms, and publishes the vendor's stated partnership with Oracle Construction and Engineering, rather than offering estimating, cost control, or accounting of record.

Can we use it for as-built records and dispute or liability questions?

Yes. The vendor markets online as-builts that let teams rewind construction to see behind sealed walls without demolition, supporting renovation planning, tenant questions, and liability claims. Because captures are timestamped and positioned over time, the Visual Command Center serves as a historical record of how the project was actually built.

How quickly do customers see returns?

The vendor reports customer outcomes including a 50% improvement in on-time completion, a 30% reduction in time to report field-level progress, and a 50% reduction in site visits by project executives. Published case studies cite a $30,000 excavation saving, a project finishing four weeks early with zero change orders, and a $17,000 concrete rework avoided, though no standard time-to-value is published.