Side-by-side compare
Up to 3 solutions, scored on the same value metrics.
ROI categoryrisk compliancerisk compliance
Time-to-ValueUnder 2 weeks, self-serve (~14d)2-6 weeks (vendor: weeks, not months) (~30d)
Typical annual TCO$0/yr$0/yr
Starting price$0/yr$0/yr
Implementation feeNoneNone
Seat tiersNot published; large-team pricing is quote-basedNo seat tiers: unlimited users on every plan; Advisor/MSP licensing is bought as Assessment-Only or Full Feature Spokes.
Implementation friction2/53/5
Friction meter
Best forSecurity and engineering teams that want exploit-proven pentest findings instead of scanner noise; DevSecOps teams working in GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket or Azure DevOps who want security checks inside the pull request; Startups through Fortune 100 organisations that need continuous offensive testing without an annual manual engagement; Teams that must show auditors reproducible request/response evidence of a breach pathGovernment agencies and regulators needing sovereign data residency and AI that runs inside their own boundary.; Defense contractors and critical infrastructure operators with air-gapped, segmented or OT environments.; Complex multi-entity enterprises running many frameworks across distributed business units.; Advisors, MSPs and vCISO providers delivering white-label GRC services to many clients from one hub.; Security, risk and compliance teams that must keep ISO 27001, NIST CSF, DORA, SOC 2, Essential Eight or IRAP obligations audit-ready.
Not forBuyers who only want a traditional SAST/SCA tool and no autonomous attack simulation; Organisations without an engineering owner to triage and remediate findings; Federal agencies or GovCon firms that require FedRAMP or CMMC credentials (not evidenced); Non-technical departments looking for a fully managed human pentest consultancyStartups and small businesses looking for a cheap self-serve checklist tool.; Teams that only need a single framework and have no multi-entity or sovereign requirements.; Organizations unwilling to run structured onboarding and Hub & Spoke configuration.; Buyers who need a published self-checkout list price before talking to sales.
Stack fit matrix
SalesforceNot supportedNot supported
AWSNot supportedNot supported
SnowflakeNot supportedNot supported
HubSpotNot supportedNot supported
Google WorkspaceNot supportedNot supported
Microsoft 365Not supportedNot supported
SAPNot supportedNot supported
SlackIntegrationNot supported
MCP (Model Context Protocol)Not supportedNot supported
Compliance
SOC 2 Listed Not listed
ISO 27001 Not listed Listed
GDPR Not listed Not listed
HIPAA Not listed Not listed
FedRAMP Not listed Not listed
CMMC Not listed Not listed
ISO 42001 Not listed Listed
IAPP AIGPnamed staff Not listed Not listed
Company & support
Who is behind each solution, and how you reach support. “Not listed” means the vendor’s public pages don’t mention a channel, not that it is unavailable.
Founded2023 (3 yrs)Not recorded
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USNot recorded
PhoneNot listedNot listed
EmailPlan not statedNot listed
Live chatNot listedNot listed
Support portal / ticketsNot listedPlan not stated
Community forumNot listedAll plans
Help centre / docsAll plansAll plans
Dedicated account managerNot listedAll plans
In person / on-siteNot listedNot listed
Support hoursNot recordedNot recorded
Response timeNot statedNot stated
AI & MCP readiness
Whether each solution can join your AI stack, and what it asks of you to do so.
MCP connectionreaches AI clientsNot supportedNot supported
AI featuresAgentic workflows; NLP automationCopilot / assistant; Document processing; NLP automation; Agentic workflows; AI governance tooling
Built around AI?AI added to an existing productAI added to an existing product
Trains on your dataNever trains on your dataNever trains on your data
Runs onOpenAI, Anthropic, Open-weight modelsNot recorded
AI pricingIncluded in the planIncluded in the plan
Model keyNot recordedNot recorded
AI usage auditFull audit trailNot recorded
Quadrant view
Where the 2 selected solutions land on the same value plane. Toggle axes to compare on cost, speed, friction, or buyer score.
Quadrant view
Typical annual cost × Time-to-value
The lines cross at the median of the solutions shown, so about half sit on each side of each line.
Looking for more options? Browse all 2456 solutions.